(a) Public sector undertakings have been the bedrock of welfareism in India for many decades. Evaluate the pros and cons of current disinvestment scenario. (20 marks)

(b) The collegium system of appointments to higher judiciary has been the cornerst

Question

(a) Public sector undertakings have been the bedrock of welfareism in India for many decades. Evaluate the pros and cons of current disinvestment scenario. (20 marks)

(b) The collegium system of appointments to higher judiciary has been the cornerstone of independence of judiciary. It has remained as the subject of debates in the recent past. Discuss. (20 marks)

(c) The concept of bureaucratic authoritarianism is one of the models of non-democratic rules. Explain. (10 marks)

UPSC Answer Check · Accepted Answer

The directive 'evaluate' in part (a) demands balanced judgment with evidence, while 'discuss' in (b) requires multi-perspective analysis and 'explain' in (c) needs conceptual clarity. Allocate approximately 40% time/words to part (a) given its evaluative complexity and 20 marks, 35% to part (b) for its discursive demands on collegium debates, and 25% to part (c) for theoretical exposition on bureaucratic authoritarianism. Structure each part with brief introduction, analytical body addressing specific demands, and synthesised conclusion.
- Part (a): PSUs' role in welfareism (employment generation, regional equity, strategic sectors) versus disinvestment rationale (fiscal stress, efficiency, competitive federalism); specific evaluation of current policy including strategic versus complete disinvestment
- Part (a): Critical assessment of disinvestment outcomes—success stories (LIC IPO, BPCL strategic sale attempts) versus concerns (asset stripping, employment loss, national security implications in strategic sectors)
- Part (b): Evolution from executive primacy (Articles 124, 217) to collegium system (Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association 1993, 1998 elaboration); mechanism of CJI plus four senior-most judges
- Part (b): Contemporary debates—transparency and accountability criticisms (NJAC 2014 attempt, 2015 Supreme Court strike down), government-collegium friction, pendency crisis, recent proposals for permanent secretariat
- Part (c): Bureaucratic authoritarianism as concept—Guillermo O'Donnell's bureaucratic-authoritarian state (BA state) in Latin America; characteristics: technocratic rule, exclusion of popular sector, depoliticisation, economic rationality over distributive claims
- Part (c): Distinction from other non-democratic models (military junta, personal dictatorship, totalitarianism); relevance to understanding technocratic governance and emergency provisions in administrative systems

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Concept correctness	20%	10	Precise delineation of disinvestment types (strategic vs minority stake), accurate exposition of collegium's constitutional evolution through three-judge cases, and correct application of O'Donnell's BA state model with its six defining features	Basic understanding of disinvestment as privatisation, collegium as judge-made system, and bureaucratic authoritarianism as rule by officials; some conceptual blurring between terms	Confuses disinvestment with liquidation, misrepresents collegium as constitutional provision, or conflates bureaucratic authoritarianism with general authoritarianism without theoretical specificity
Theoretical anchor	20%	10	Deploys R.K. Hegde on PSU efficiency, Granville Austin on Indian constitutionalism, O'Donnell's structural-historical analysis of BA states, and Montesquieu/separation of powers for judicial independence debate	References to basic welfare state theory for PSUs, generic rule of law arguments for judiciary, and standard political science definitions of authoritarianism	No theoretical framework; purely descriptive treatment without scholarly anchoring or incorrect attribution of theories
Indian administrative examples	20%	10	Specific illustrations: Air India-Tata deal, LIC IPO valuation concerns; collegium's KM Joseph elevation controversy, recent proposals for CJI-led secretariat; Emergency 1975-77 as Indian variant of technocratic-authoritarian tendency	General mention of Navratna PSUs, NJAC case, and Emergency period without specific administrative mechanisms or recent developments	No Indian examples or irrelevant/inaccurate references (e.g., citing non-existent PSU reforms, confusing collegium with NJAC operation)
Reform / policy angle	20%	10	Critical engagement with National Monetisation Pipeline, proposed Public Sector Enterprise Policy 2020; specific reform suggestions for collegium (memorandum of procedure reforms, all-India judicial service); safeguards against bureaucratic overreach	Generic reform mentions—more PSU autonomy, some transparency in judicial appointments, general democratic accountability measures	No reform perspective or purely ideological stance (complete privatisation or complete retention without analysis); no engagement with contemporary policy discourse
Conclusion & forward look	20%	10	Synthesised conclusion balancing efficiency-equity for PSUs, reconciling judicial independence with accountability through structured dialogue, and identifying democratic resilience mechanisms against technocratic overreach; forward-looking on NMP 2025 targets, proposed judicial reforms	Separate conclusions for each part without integration; standard summary without prognostic element	No conclusion or abrupt ending; mere repetition of points; no forward-looking element or unrealistic/unsubstantiated predictions

Q4

Directive word: Evaluate

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Key points expected

Evaluation rubric

Practice this exact question

More from Public Administration 2024 Paper II