Public Administration 2024 Paper II 50 marks 150 words Compulsory Comment

Q5

Answer the following in about 150 words each: (a) The constitutional stature provided to the Public Service Commissions accord them the autonomy to work towards fair recruitments. Comment. (10 marks) (b) "The neutrality of civil service has become a myth." Comment. (10 marks) (c) Examine the role of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) in protecting the interests of consumers. (10 marks) (d) "Parliamentary control over public expenditure is declining." Comment. (10 marks) (e) "The Liberalization, Privatization and Globalization (LPG) has enhanced the participation of private sector in Indian Economy." Comment. (10 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित में से प्रत्येक का लगभग 150 शब्दों में उत्तर दीजिए : (a) लोक सेवा आयोगों को प्रदत्त संवैधानिक दर्जा उन्हें निष्पक्ष भर्तियाँ करने के लिए स्वायत्तता प्रदान करती है। टिप्पणी कीजिए। (10 अंक) (b) "सिविल सेवा की निष्पक्षता एक मिथक बन गई है।" टिप्पणी कीजिए। (10 अंक) (c) उपभोक्ताओं के हितों को सुरक्षित करने में भारतीय दूरसंचार नियामक प्राधिकरण (ट्राई) की भूमिका का परीक्षण कीजिए। (10 अंक) (d) "सार्वजनिक व्यय पर संसदीय नियंत्रण कम हो रहा है।" टिप्पणी कीजिए। (10 अंक) (e) "उदारीकरण, निजीकरण और भूमंडलीकरण (एल.पी.जी.) ने भारतीय अर्थव्यवस्था में निजी क्षेत्र की सहभागिता को बढ़ाया है।" टिप्पणी कीजिए। (10 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2024 Public Administration questions

Directive word: Comment

This question asks you to comment. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'comment' requires balanced analysis with personal assessment across all five sub-parts. Allocate approximately 30 words per sub-part (150 words total), spending roughly equal time on each since all carry equal marks. Structure each sub-part as: brief context → dual-sided analysis → nuanced conclusion. For (a), examine constitutional provisions enabling PSC autonomy; for (b), debate civil service neutrality with contemporary evidence; for (c), assess TRAI's consumer protection mechanisms; for (d), evaluate parliamentary oversight mechanisms; for (e), analyze LPG's private sector impact. Conclude each with a forward-looking observation.

Key points expected

  • (a) Constitutional stature: Articles 315-323, independence safeguards (removal process, salary charged on Consolidated Fund), limitations like government control over rules/regulations affecting autonomy
  • (b) Civil service neutrality: Political interference, 'committed bureaucracy' critique, lateral entry challenges, counter-arguments citing All-India Services (conduct rules) and institutional resilience
  • (c) TRAI consumer protection: Tariff regulation, QoS standards, TRAI Act 1997 amendments, mobile number portability, grievance redressal, limitations in spectrum auction outcomes
  • (d) Parliamentary control: PAC effectiveness decline, CAG reports implementation gap, anti-defection law impact, money bill classification issues, alternative mechanisms (social audit, RTI)
  • (e) LPG reforms: Disinvestment policy, PPP models, FDI liberalization, strategic sectors debate, employment shift patterns, Atmanirbhar Bharat balancing act

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Accurately identifies constitutional provisions for PSC autonomy (Articles 315-323), distinguishes between political and administrative neutrality, correctly describes TRAI's statutory functions under TRAI Act 1997, identifies specific parliamentary control mechanisms (PAC, CAG, Standing Committees), and precisely defines LPG components with their sectoral applicationsBasic identification of constitutional/statutory bases with minor inaccuracies; conflates neutrality with anonymity or confuses TRAI with TDSAT; vague reference to parliamentary committees without specificity; generic description of liberalization without sectoral nuanceFundamental errors like confusing PSC with SSC, misidentifying TRAI as a ministry department, equating parliamentary decline solely with corruption, or describing LPG as merely 'foreign investment'
Theoretical anchor20%10Deploys Riggs' prismatic society model for (b) neutrality debate, uses Wilsonian politics-administration dichotomy, applies regulatory capture theory for (c), references Hamilton's legislative control principles for (d), and utilizes Washington Consensus/stakeholder capitalism frameworks for (e); integrates Second ARC recommendations where relevantSurface mention of generic theories without application; references 'separation of powers' or 'good governance' without specificity; mentions Second ARC without citing specific report numbers or recommendationsNo theoretical framework; purely descriptive answers; misapplied theories (e.g., using Marxist critique for PSC autonomy without relevance)
Indian administrative examples20%10Cites specific instances: UPSC's role in lateral entry controversy for (a); Haryana cadre allocation controversy or Ashok Khemka transfers for (b); 2016 Reliance Jio free services case or call drop penalty imposition for (c); 2G-CAG report non-implementation or recent electoral bonds scrutiny limitations for (d); Air India privatization or telecom sector transformation for (e)Generic references to 'recent scams' or 'disinvestment' without naming; mentions 'call drops' for TRAI without specific regulatory action; references 'many CAG reports' without specificityNo contemporary examples; outdated references (pre-2010 without relevance); factually incorrect examples (e.g., attributing SEBI functions to TRAI)
Reform / policy angle20%10Discusses proposed UPSC reforms (performance audit), civil service reforms (mission Karmayogi), TRAI's transition to TRAI Act 2.0 proposals, proposed Public Accounts Committee strengthening, and National Monetization Pipeline/Production Linked Incentive schemes; evaluates effectiveness with critical distanceLists reforms without evaluation; mentions 'Digital India' or 'Make in India' generically without connecting to specific question demands; uncritical acceptance of government claimsNo reform discussion; purely historical narrative; suggests irrelevant reforms (e.g., judicial reforms for PSC autonomy)
Conclusion & forward look20%10Synthesizes across sub-parts to identify systemic patterns (institutional autonomy vs. accountability tension); proposes actionable measures (statutory insulation for PSCs, outcome-based parliamentary oversight metrics); demonstrates balanced optimism with institutional realism; ends with 75th year of independence/administrative reform relevanceGeneric concluding statements ('need for political will', 'reforms should be implemented'); no synthesis across parts; purely descriptive endings without assessmentNo conclusion; abrupt endings; contradictory final statements; unrealistic prescriptions (e.g., 'abolish political parties' for neutrality); purely negative or purely positive assessments without nuance

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Public Administration 2024 Paper II