Public Administration 2024 Paper II 50 marks Comment

Paper II — Q6

(a) "The success of administrative reforms in a country like India depends upon the political will." Comment. (20 marks) (b) The…

(a)

"The success of administrative reforms in a country like India depends upon the political will." Comment. 20 marks

(b)

The journey of transformation of local governance has been long. Examine the challenges to realise the spirit of gram swaraj. 20 marks

(c)

With what aims and objectives was the Capacity Building Commission established? Evaluate how far it has come in realising the goals. 10 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

"भारत जैसे देश में प्रशासनिक सुधारों की सफलता राजनीतिक इच्छा शक्ति पर निर्भर करती है।" टिप्पणी कीजिए। (20 अंक)

(b)

स्थानीय शासन के रूपांतरण की यात्रा लंबी रही है। ग्राम स्वराज की भावना को प्राप्त करने में चुनौतियों का परीक्षण कीजिए। (20 अंक)

(c)

क्षमता निर्माण आयोग को किन लक्ष्य और उद्देश्यों के लिए स्थापित किया गया था ? मूल्यांकन कीजिए कि वह कहां तक उन लक्ष्यों को प्राप्त कर पाया है। (10 अंक)

Q6 of the 2024 UPSC Mains Public Administration Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2024 Public Administration paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Political Will and Administrative Reforms

Gerald Caiden defined administrative reform as the artificial inducement of administrative transformation against resistance, which is why political will matters so much. Political will is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for the success of administrative reforms. While executive determination provides the policy mandate, reforms frequently stall due to bureaucratic resistance, status-quo bias, and systemic resource constraints. Many recommendations of the first ARC (1966) and the Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2005–09, 15 reports) remain unimplemented; ARC II emphasized that an effective political-bureaucratic interface is vital to balance democratic accountability with administrative professionalism, ensuring that policy intent translates into structural change.

Where political commitment has been resolute, complex administrative and structural transformations have succeeded. The pan-India rollout of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and the transition to Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) demonstrate how high-level political backing can overcome entrenched administrative inertia and inter-jurisdictional friction. Conversely, where political will is deficient, reforms languish despite clear institutional mandates. The chronic non-implementation of police reforms across states—notwithstanding binding directives from the Supreme Court in the Prakash Singh v. Union of India (2006) case—illustrates how an absence of political commitment stalls vital institutional modernization. Thus, while political will acts as the primary catalyst, enduring administrative success requires overcoming bureaucratic resistance and addressing systemic design flaws.

(b) Challenges in Realising Gram Swaraj

The trajectory of democratic decentralization—progressing from the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee (1957) to the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts (1992) and the Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA, 1996)—reflects a significant structural-implementation gap. Realising Mahatma Gandhi’s ideal of village self-reliance (Gram Swaraj) is constrained by five structural challenges.

First, fiscal autonomy remains negligible: the RBI’s 2024 study of panchayat finances found own tax revenue to be only about 1% of their total revenue, leaving them dependent on state and central transfers, many of them tied. Second, there is a critical shortage of dedicated functionaries, forcing local bodies to rely on deputed staff lacking local accountability. Third, functional overlap persists because state line departments resist devolving the 29 subjects listed in the Eleventh Schedule, treating PRIs as mere implementation agencies; the Ministry of Panchayati Raj’s Devolution Index shows wide variation across states, and several states have been slow to frame PESA rules, weakening Gram Sabhas in Scheduled Areas. Fourth, entrenched social hierarchies and dominant caste capture, along with proxy representation such as Sarpanch Pati, undermine genuine grassroots democracy. Fifth, the prevailing digital divide hinders the effective adoption of e-governance platforms such as e-GramSwaraj, keeping decentralization procedural rather than substantive. Yet the journey has produced real gains: about 1.4 million elected women representatives and a regular electoral cycle show that the foundations of gram swaraj exist, even if its spirit of self-reliant, deliberative village democracy remains unrealised.

(c) Capacity Building Commission: Aims and Evaluation

The Capacity Building Commission (CBC) was constituted in April 2021 under Mission Karmayogi, following Cabinet approval of the National Programme for Civil Services Capacity Building (NPCSCB) in 2020. Its core objectives are to standardize civil service training, design competency frameworks (FRAC), and benchmark capacity-building plans across ministries to transition civil servants from a rules-based to a roles-based mindset.

In terms of progress, the CBC has helped ministries prepare Annual Capacity Building Plans, supported the growth of the iGOT-Karmayogi digital platform (run by the special purpose vehicle Karmayogi Bharat) to millions of learners, and anchored initiatives such as the National Learning Week (Karmayogi Saptah, 2024). However, its effectiveness is constrained by its creation through an executive order rather than a statutory enactment, limiting its operational authority over recalcitrant departments. State-level adoption remains uneven, even though most civil servants work for states, and course completions are easier to count than changes in behaviour and service delivery, which are harder to measure. For the CBC to sustainably professionalize Indian administration, it requires greater institutional autonomy, possibly statutory backing, and outcome-based evaluation of its training.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: Public Administration, Paper 2

What earns full marks: Comprehensive, well-structured, with specific Indian examples and balanced judgment.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) (a) "The success of administrative reforms in a country like India depends upon the political will." Comment. (20 marks) 20 marks

    comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close

    Must cover

    • Concept of administrative reform (Caiden) and why political will matters: mandate, resources, overcoming resistance
    • Indian reform history: ARC I (1966), ARC II (2005–09), Seventh/Pay Commissions; implementation gap
    • Examples of success with political will (GST, DBT/JAM, Mission Karmayogi, decriminalisation) and failure without it (police reforms after Prakash Singh 2006, civil service tenure)
    • Other determinants: bureaucratic buy-in, capacity, federal cooperation, sequencing, public support; balanced comment

    Loses marks

    • Treating political will as the only factor

    Earns more

    • Comparative reform experience (e.g. UK Next Steps, NPM reforms)

    Extra mark

    • Concept of 'reform champions' and coalitions
  2. (b) (b) The journey of transformation of local governance has been long. Examine the challenges to realise the spirit of gram swaraj. (20 marks) 20 marks

    examine— intro → how/why with reasoning → evidence → conclusion

    Must cover

    • Gandhian gram swaraj and the journey: Article 40, Balwantray Mehta (1957), Ashok Mehta (1978), 73rd/74th Amendments (1992), PESA (1996)
    • Fiscal challenges: weak own revenue (RBI 2024 study), dependence on tied grants, SFC gaps
    • Functional and functionary gaps: incomplete devolution of 29 subjects, parallel bodies, staff shortages; Devolution Index variations; PESA rules delays
    • Social and political challenges: caste and elite capture, proxy representation, weak Gram Sabhas; achievements (women representatives, e-GramSwaraj) and way to realise the spirit

    Loses marks

    • Describing history without examining challenges

    Earns more

    • Kerala and other state good practices

    Extra mark

    • Second ARC 6th Report recommendations
  3. (c) (c) With what aims and objectives was the Capacity Building Commission established? Evaluate how far it has come in realising the goals. (10 marks) 10 marks

    evaluate— criteria → evidence → balanced judgment

    Must cover

    • Establishment: April 2021 under NPCSCB/Mission Karmayogi (approved 2020)
    • Aims: harmonise training, competency frameworks (FRAC), annual capacity building plans, oversee training institutions, shift from rules to roles
    • Achievements: ACBPs for ministries, iGOT-Karmayogi reach, Karmayogi Saptah (2024), standards for training institutes
    • Evaluation: executive rather than statutory body, uneven state adoption, measuring behavioural outcomes; suggestions

    Loses marks

    • No evaluation of progress

    Earns more

    • Link to Second ARC's recommendations on training

    Extra mark

    • Comparison with other countries' civil service training bodies
What "Comment" is asking you to do

Take a position on the statement and support it. Comment usually attaches to a quoted line in the short slots, so the reasoning must be compressed — an opening view, a few load-bearing reasons, and the limit of the claim.

Structure that answers it

Unpack what the statement asserts → your stance → two or three supporting reasons → the qualification that limits it

Where marks are lost

Neutral summary; a comment without a stance has not answered. Equally costly is accepting the quoted line wholesale and never testing where it fails.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Public Administration 2024 Paper II

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in