Paper II — Q2
(a) What is identity politics ? Discuss the main trends in Dalit movements in India. (20 marks) (b) Is Indian society moving…
What is identity politics ? Discuss the main trends in Dalit movements in India. 20 marks
Is Indian society moving from "Hierarchy" towards "differentiation" ? Illustrate your answer with suitable examples. 20 marks
Discuss the salient features of 'new middle class' in India. 10 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
पहचान की राजनीति क्या है ? भारत में दलित आंदोलन के प्रमुख रुझानों की व्याख्या करें । (20 अंक)
क्या भारतीय समाज "पदानुक्रम" से "विभेदीकरण" की ओर अग्रसर है ? उपयुक्त उदाहरणों के साथ इस पर प्रकाश डालें । (20 अंक)
भारत में 'नव मध्यम वर्ग' के विशिष्ट लक्षणों की चर्चा करें । (10 अंक)
Model answer
Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.
(a) Identity politics and the main trends in Dalit movements
Identity politics is political mobilisation around shared markers such as caste, religion, language or gender, to claim recognition, dignity and a share of power. Charles Taylor's "politics of recognition" and Nancy Fraser's argument on status parity and redistribution frame it.
Main trends in Dalit movements:
- Anti-caste and civil-rights phase (Ambedkar): the Mahad Satyagraha (1927) for public water, the Kalaram temple entry (1930), political representation, and mass conversion to Buddhism (1956).
- Electoral assertion: from the 1980s, Kanshi Ram and the Bahujan Samaj Party (1984) moved the agenda from social reform to capturing state power through a broad "Bahujan" identity.
- Welfare and recognition focus: after reservation expanded and Mandal, claims turned to quotas, state patronage and symbolic recognition (statues, memorials), with critics noting a shift from annihilating caste to bargaining within it.
- Cultural and digital assertion: Dalit literature, music, and youth groups such as the Bhim Army (2015) use social media and rights language.
- Internal differentiation: sub-caste cleavages (Mala and Madiga in Andhra and Telangana, Jatav and non-Jatav groups in Uttar Pradesh) led to demands for sub-classification within the SC quota; the Supreme Court in 2024 allowed States to sub-classify Scheduled Castes.
(b) Is Indian society moving from hierarchy to differentiation?
Louis Dumont's Homo Hierarchicus held that the opposition of purity and pollution ranks groups in a single encompassing hierarchy. "Differentiation" means that spheres such as economy, polity and law become distinct from ritual rank, a view in line with Béteille's finding that caste, class and power no longer coincide as they once did.
Evidence for differentiation:
- Markets, cities, education and private employment allow occupational mobility detached from birth.
- Caste associations and parties act as horizontal interest groups competing for power, so caste works as a political, not only ritual, category.
- Land reform, the Constitution's equality norms and reservation weaken the link between caste rank and economic and political power.
Evidence of persistent hierarchy:
- Endogamy remains strong; matrimonial advertisements still sort by caste.
- Residential segregation, untouchability practices and atrocities against Dalits persist.
- Social capital and elite positions remain concentrated in upper castes.
Hierarchy is thus not replaced but coexists with differentiation: public, market and political spheres differentiate faster than kinship, marriage and everyday social relations.
(c) Salient features of the 'new middle class' in India
- Origin: it grew after the 1991 liberalisation, rooted in private corporate, IT and service jobs, unlike the older middle class of public-sector and civil-service employment.
- Consumption and aspiration: identity is expressed through consumption, malls, gated housing and private education and healthcare.
- Caste profile: drawn disproportionately from upper and dominant castes, yet it speaks the language of merit and often opposes reservation.
- Politics and public space: Leela Fernandes describes a "politics of forgetting" that sidelines the urban poor in public space; Arvind Rajagopal speaks of a "split public" between English-language elite media and vernacular mass politics.
- Social and global ties: it is globally connected through migration, remittances and diaspora networks.
How this answer will be evaluated
Framework: Sociology Paper II (Social Change and Development)
What earns full marks: Precise definitions, clear analytical framework, strong Indian examples, and a balanced, well-argued conclusion.
Evaluation rubric
Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.
- (a) Define identity politics and discuss the main trends in Dalit movements in India, 20 marks 20 marks
discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close
Must cover
- Definition of identity politics with recognition and redistribution (Taylor, Fraser)
- Phases: Ambedkarite civil-rights movement, electoral assertion (Kanshi Ram, BSP), cultural and digital assertion
- Internal differentiation and sub-classification demands
Loses marks
- Skipping the definition of identity politics
- Partisan commentary on parties
Earns more
- Accurate events: Mahad 1927, Kalaram 1930, conversion 1956, BSP 1984
- Shift from annihilation of caste to recognition and quota politics
- Supreme Court's 2024 ruling on SC sub-classification
Extra mark
- Bhim Army and Dalit literature as newer forms
- (b) Examine whether Indian society is moving from hierarchy to differentiation, with examples, 20 marks 20 marks
comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close
Must cover
- Dumont's hierarchy versus differentiation of spheres
- Evidence for differentiation: market, education, caste associations as political groups
- Evidence of persisting hierarchy: endogamy, residential segregation, atrocities
Loses marks
- A one-sided yes or no answer
- Misattributing concepts to wrong thinkers
Earns more
- Béteille's point on caste, class and power drifting apart
- Conclusion that both coexist unevenly
- Specific examples
Extra mark
- Contrast between public and private spheres
- (c) Discuss the salient features of the 'new middle class' in India, 10 marks 10 marks
discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close
Must cover
- Post-1991 origin in the private, IT and service sectors
- Consumption and aspiration
- Caste profile and merit discourse
Loses marks
- Confusing it with the older state-employed middle class
- Value-laden stereotyping
Earns more
- Fernandes or Rajagopal as scholarly references
- Exclusion of the urban poor and the split public
Extra mark
- Global connections through migration and diaspora
What "Discuss" is asking you to do
Lay the issue out from more than one side — how it arose, what is claimed for it, what is held against it, and where it now stands. UPSC attaches discuss to broad topics with several live dimensions, so coverage of the dimensions earns more than the strength of your opinion.
Structure that answers it
Set the issue up → the case as it is made → the case against → the dimension both sides leave out → where the balance now lies
Where marks are lost
Listing facts with no thread between them, or arguing one side throughout and calling it a discussion.
Practice this exact question
Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.
Evaluate my answer →More from Sociology 2021 Paper II
- Q1 Write short answers, with a sociological perspective, of the following questions in about…
- Q2 (a) What is identity politics ? Discuss the main trends in Dalit movements in India. (20…
- Q3 (a) Discuss in detail the major contribution of Prof. Yogendra Singh in theorizing India'…
- Q4 (a) What are the sociological reasons and implication of "reverse migration" during the r…
- Q5 Write short answers, with sociological perspective, of the following questions in about 1…