Sociology 2023 Paper II 50 marks Explain

Paper II — Q8

(a) Explain the thematic linkages between 'Patriarchy' and 'Honour killing' in India, citing some recent cases. (20 marks) (b)…

(a)

Explain the thematic linkages between 'Patriarchy' and 'Honour killing' in India, citing some recent cases. 20 marks

(b)

Discuss the challenges faced by the cooperative movements in India. Suggest measures to strengthen the movement at the grass-roots level. 20 marks

(c)

What is 'Ageing' ? Discuss the major problems of aged people in India. 10 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

कुछ हालिया मामलों का हवाला देते हुए भारत में 'पितृसत्ता' और 'सम्मान रक्षा हेतु हत्या' (ऑनर किलिंग) के बीच विषयगत संबंधों की व्याख्या कीजिए । (20 अंक)

(b)

भारत में सहकारी आंदोलनों के सामने आने वाली चुनौतियों की चर्चा कीजिए । जमीनी स्तर पर इस आंदोलन को मजबूत करने के उपाय सुझाइए । (20 अंक)

(c)

'वयोवृद्धि' से क्या अभिप्राय है ? भारत में वृद्ध लोगों की मुख्य समस्याओं की चर्चा कीजिए । (10 अंक)

Q8 of the 2023 UPSC Mains Sociology Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2023 Sociology paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Patriarchy and honour killing

Patriarchy in India is a structural order in which male kin control women's sexuality, marriage and mobility, and caste endogamy and lineage purity depend on that control. Honour killing is its extreme enforcement: when a woman or man chooses a partner across caste, gotra or religion, the family or community reads it as a loss of izzat and a breach of endogamy and gotra exogamy, and answers with boycott, coercion or murder. Honour here is collective, so the punishment is public and often approved by caste bodies; khap panchayats in Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh have issued such diktats without legal authority. The victims can be men as well, typically Dalit husbands, showing how gender and caste operate together.

Cases show the chain. In Manoj–Babli (Haryana, 2007), a khap order led to the killing of a same-gotra couple, and in 2010 a Karnal court sentenced five to death, a first for such a case. In the Kausalya–Shankar case (Tamil Nadu, 2016), a Dalit husband was hacked to death in public, and the court convicted the wife's family. Pranay Perumalla (Telangana, 2018) and Kevin Joseph (Kerala, 2018) are further cases.

The Supreme Court's guidance in Lata Singh (2006) and Shakti Vahini (2018) directs preventive, remedial and punitive steps against khap interference, yet India has no separate central law, and a Law Commission draft (2012) remains unenacted. Change needs legal reform, safe houses and social change in norms of marriage and caste.

(b) Challenges to cooperative movements and measures to strengthen them at the grass roots

India's cooperatives, from the Cooperative Credit Societies Act 1904 to the Amul model of Tribhuvandas Patel and Verghese Kurien, hold both success and failure.

Challenges: political interference and patronage in boards and elections; bureaucratic control by registrars; weak professional management and audit; member apathy and domination by large and dominant-caste members, so that small farmers and women are excluded; poor capital and dependence on government funds and NABARD refinance; heavy losses and poor recovery in rural credit cooperatives and PACS; and sharp regional imbalance, with strength in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Kerala and weakness in eastern and central India. The 97th Amendment (2011) made cooperatives a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(c) and added Article 43B, but in Union of India v. Rajendra N. Shah (2021) the Supreme Court struck down Part IXB as it applies to state cooperatives for want of ratification by states, leaving it valid for multi-state societies.

Measures: insulate elections and audit from political control through independent state election authorities; enact state laws in the spirit of the amendment; professionalise management and train members; computerise PACS, widen them to multi-service centres with dairy, storage and Jan Aushadhi roles, using the Ministry of Cooperation (2021); give women and small farmers seats and leadership; and link cooperatives to markets through federations and e-platforms.

(c) Ageing and the problems of the aged

Ageing is the rising share of older people in a population, in India those aged 60 and above, arising from falling fertility and rising life expectancy. It is also a social process in which roles, status and dependence change with the life cycle. Census 2011 counted 8.6% (10.4 crore) aged 60 and above, and the UNFPA India Ageing Report 2023 projects about 20% by 2050.

Major problems: income insecurity and pension gaps, as most older people worked in the informal sector; poor health and high out-of-pocket costs; loneliness and loss of role as migration and nuclear families thin support; abuse and neglect; feminisation of ageing, with widows facing double disadvantage; and poor rural access to care. Responses include the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007, the National Policy for Senior Citizens, the Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme and Ayushman Bharat cover for those aged 70 and above, though coverage and enforcement are thin.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: Sociology Paper II: Define > Thinker > Argument > Indian illustration

What earns full marks: Precise definitions, specific cases/data, clear linkages, and well-mapped solutions.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) (a) Explain the thematic linkages between patriarchy and honour killing in India, citing recent cases (20 marks). 20 marks

    explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close

    Must cover

    • Patriarchy as control over women's sexuality, marriage and mobility, tied to caste endogamy
    • Honour killing as enforcement: izzat, gotra exogamy, collective honour, khap diktats
    • Specific cases: Manoj-Babli 2007, Kausalya-Shankar 2016, Pranay Perumalla 2018, Kevin Joseph 2018
    • Legal response: Lata Singh, Shakti Vahini 2018, absence of a central law

    Loses marks

    • Treating unrelated violence as honour killing.
    • Cases with wrong facts.

    Earns more

    • Gender and caste intersection; Dalit victims.
    • Law Commission draft 2012.
    • Need for social change and safe houses.

    Extra mark

    • Sociological concepts such as caste purity
    • Conviction outcomes
  2. (b) (b) Discuss the challenges faced by cooperative movements in India and suggest measures to strengthen them at the grass-roots level (20 marks). 20 marks

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Challenges: political interference, bureaucratic control, weak management and audit, member apathy and elite domination
    • Financial and regional issues: capital dependence, PACS losses, regional imbalance
    • Legal framework: 97th Amendment, Article 19(1)(c), 43B, Rajendra N. Shah 2021
    • Measures: independent elections and audit, professionalisation, computerised PACS, inclusion of women and small farmers, Ministry of Cooperation

    Loses marks

    • Only listing challenges.
    • Wrong legal claims about the 97th Amendment.

    Earns more

    • Amul model as success.
    • Market linkage through federations.
    • State legislation.

    Extra mark

    • Current policy reference such as the National Cooperation Policy
    • Comparative cases
  3. (c) (c) What is ageing? Discuss the major problems of the aged in India (10 marks). 10 marks

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Definition: rising share of persons aged 60+, demographic and social process
    • Data: Census 2011 8.6%, UNFPA 2023 projection
    • Problems: income and pension gaps, health costs, loneliness, abuse, feminisation
    • Responses: 2007 Act, NPSrC, IGNOAPS, Ayushman Bharat 70+

    Loses marks

    • Generic sympathy without problems.
    • Missing the definition.

    Earns more

    • Migration and nuclear families.
    • Rural access gaps.
    • Widowhood.

    Extra mark

    • Sociological concepts such as disengagement
    • Active ageing
What "Explain" is asking you to do

Make the working of something clear — what sets it off, what follows from what, and what it produces. Explain is the Commission's mechanism word: it dominates the technical papers and the “explain why” stems, where the marks sit in the causal chain and not in the label.

Structure that answers it

State what it is → the initiating condition → the chain of cause, step by step → an instance where it plays out → what the chain produces

Where marks are lost

Describing what something looks like instead of why it works that way. Naming the stages without linking them reads as description too.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Sociology 2023 Paper II

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in