Statistics 2021 Paper II 50 marks Explain

Paper II — Q8

(a) What is autocorrelation ? What are its consequences ? Explain the Goldfeld-Quandt test and Glesjer test for…

(a)

What is autocorrelation ? What are its consequences ? Explain the Goldfeld-Quandt test and Glesjer test for heteroscedasticity.

20 marks

(b)

Check the identifiability of the following two-equation system :

β₁₁y₁ₜ + β₁₂y₂ₜ + γ₁₁x₁ₜ + γ₁₂x₂ₜ = u₁ₜ β₂₁y₁ₜ + β₂₂y₂ₜ + γ₂₁x₁ₜ + γ₂₂x₂ₜ = u₂ₜ

Given the restrictions (i) γ₁₂ = 0, γ₂₁ = 0 and (ii) γ₁₁ = 0, γ₁₂ = 0

15 marks

(c)

Describe Leslie matrix and describe Leslie Matrix Technique for the population projection.

15 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

स्वसहसंबंध क्या है ? इसके परिणाम क्या हैं ? विषम विचलितता (हेटेरोस्किडास्टिसिटी) के लिए गोल्डफेल्ड-क्वांट (Goldfeld-Quandt) परीक्षण और ग्लेसजर (Glesjer) परीक्षण को समझाइए ।

(20 अंक)

(b)

निम्नलिखित द्वि-समीकरण प्रणाली की अभिज्ञेयता (आइडेंटिफायबिलिटी) की जाँच कीजिए :

β₁₁y₁ₜ + β₁₂y₂ₜ + γ₁₁x₁ₜ + γ₁₂x₂ₜ = u₁ₜ β₂₁y₁ₜ + β₂₂y₂ₜ + γ₂₁x₁ₜ + γ₂₂x₂ₜ = u₂ₜ

दिये गये प्रतिबंध हैं (i) γ₁₂ = 0, γ₂₁ = 0 और (ii) γ₁₁ = 0, γ₁₂ = 0

(15 अंक)

(c)

लेस्ली (Leslie) आव्यूह का वर्णन कीजिए और समष्टि प्रक्षेपण के लिए लेस्ली आव्यूह तकनीक का वर्णन कीजिए ।

(15 अंक)

Q8 of the 2021 UPSC Mains Statistics Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2021 Statistics paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Autocorrelation and tests for heteroscedasticity

Autocorrelation is serial correlation between the disturbances of a time-series regression, so that uₜ is correlated with uₜ₋₁ (for example uₜ = ρuₜ₋₁ + εₜ). It differs from heteroscedasticity, where the error variance changes across observations.

Consequences. With strictly exogenous regressors, OLS estimators remain unbiased and consistent but are no longer efficient (not BLUE). The usual standard errors are biased, typically too small under positive autocorrelation, so t and F tests overstate significance, R² looks inflated and forecasts are inefficient. If a lagged dependent variable is a regressor, OLS is also inconsistent.

Goldfeld–Quandt test. It is used when the error variance is suspected to rise with an ordering variable Z. Order the observations by Z, omit the c middle observations, and fit the same regression separately to the lower and upper groups. Under H₀ (equal variances), F = [RSS_upper/(n₁ − k)] / [RSS_lower/(n₂ − k)] follows an F distribution, and a large value indicates variance increasing with Z. It is simple but needs a known ordering variable and loses the omitted observations.

Glejser test. Fit the model by OLS and take the absolute residuals |eᵢ|. Regress them on the suspect variable in forms such as |eᵢ| = a + bXᵢ, |eᵢ| = a + b√Xᵢ or |eᵢ| = a + b/Xᵢ. If b is significantly different from zero, heteroscedasticity is indicated, and the best-fitting form shows its pattern. It uses all the observations and also suggests a transformation, but the auxiliary errors are not well-behaved, so it is mainly a large-sample test.

(b) Identifiability of the two-equation system

Here the number of endogenous variables is M = 2 and of exogenous variables is K = 2. The order condition for an equation is K − k ≥ M − 1 = 1, where k is the number of exogenous variables it contains. The rank condition needs the matrix of coefficients, in the other equation, of the variables excluded from this one to have rank M − 1 = 1.

Case (i): γ₁₂ = 0 and γ₂₁ = 0. Equation 1 excludes x₂ and equation 2 excludes x₁, so K − k = 1 for each and the order condition holds with equality. The excluded x₂ appears in equation 2 with coefficient γ₂₂, and the excluded x₁ appears in equation 1 with coefficient γ₁₁. If γ₂₂ ≠ 0 and γ₁₁ ≠ 0 the rank condition holds, so both equations, and the system, are exactly identified.

Case (ii): γ₁₁ = 0 and γ₁₂ = 0. Equation 1 excludes both x₁ and x₂, so K − k = 2 > 1. The excluded variables appear in equation 2 with coefficients γ₂₁ and γ₂₂, so the rank is 1 if either is non-zero. Equation 1 is then over-identified. Equation 2 contains both x₁ and x₂, so K − k = 0 < 1 and it is not identified. Hence the system as a whole is not identified.

(c) Leslie matrix and population projection

The Leslie matrix L is a square matrix for a female population divided into n age groups. Its first row holds the age-specific fertility terms Fᵢ (births per woman in group i, allowing for survival of the newborns), its sub-diagonal holds the survival probabilities Pᵢ from group i to i + 1, and every other entry is zero.

Projection technique: let n(t) be the vector of the numbers in each age group at time t. Then n(t + 1) = L n(t), where the first row creates the new births and the sub-diagonal moves survivors up one age group. Repeating this gives n(t + k) = Lᵏ n(t), so a population projection needs only the initial age distribution, fertility and survival rates.

If the rates stay constant, L has a dominant positive eigenvalue λ. In the long run the population grows by a factor λ per period (intrinsic rate r = ln λ) and settles into the stable age distribution given by the corresponding eigenvector, whatever the initial age distribution. The projection assumes constant rates and ignores migration unless it is added.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: UPSC Statistics Paper 2

What earns full marks: Precise definitions, correct application of conditions, clear matrix structure, and logical flow.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Define autocorrelation and its consequences and explain the Goldfeld–Quandt and Glejser tests for heteroscedasticity. 20 marks

    explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close

    Must cover

    • Definition of autocorrelation and its consequences (unbiased but inefficient, biased standard errors)
    • Goldfeld–Quandt: ordering, omitting middle observations, F ratio of residual variances
    • Glejser: regression of absolute residuals on the regressor

    Loses marks

    • Confusing autocorrelation with heteroscedasticity

    Earns more

    • Distinction from heteroscedasticity
    • Correct F statistic and its direction
    • Alternative functional forms in the Glejser test

    Extra mark

    • Limitations of each test
  2. (b) Check the identifiability of the two-equation system under the two sets of restrictions. 15 marks

    examine— intro → how/why with reasoning → evidence → conclusion

    Must cover

    • Order and rank conditions stated with M = 2 and K = 2
    • Case (i): both equations exactly identified
    • Case (ii): equation 1 over-identified, equation 2 not identified

    Loses marks

    • Using the order condition alone without the rank condition

    Earns more

    • Checking the rank condition with non-zero coefficients
    • Overall system conclusion
  3. (c) Describe the Leslie matrix and the Leslie matrix technique for population projection. 15 marks

    describe— define → structure or process in order → labelled diagram → significance

    Must cover

    • Structure: fertility in first row, survival on the sub-diagonal
    • Projection n(t+1) = L n(t) and repeated multiplication
    • Dominant eigenvalue and stable age distribution

    Loses marks

    • Placing survival probabilities in the first row

    Earns more

    • Interpretation of the first row and sub-diagonal
    • Intrinsic growth rate r = ln lambda

    Extra mark

    • Assumptions of constant rates and no migration
What "Explain" is asking you to do

Make the working of something clear — what sets it off, what follows from what, and what it produces. Explain is the Commission's mechanism word: it dominates the technical papers and the “explain why” stems, where the marks sit in the causal chain and not in the label.

Structure that answers it

State what it is → the initiating condition → the chain of cause, step by step → an instance where it plays out → what the chain produces

Where marks are lost

Describing what something looks like instead of why it works that way. Naming the stages without linking them reads as description too.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Statistics 2021 Paper II

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in