Paper II — Q8
(a) Four items are to be constructed so that they are equispaced on the difficulty scale. If the easiest item is passed by 85% of…
Four items are to be constructed so that they are equispaced on the difficulty scale. If the easiest item is passed by 85% of the group and the most difficult by 25%, find the percentage of individuals in the group passing the other two items.
(Standard Normal tables are provided) 15 marks
Define Crude Birth Rate, General Fertility Rate and Age-specific Fertility Rate and indicate why each is considered an improvement on the preceding measure of fertility.
Define Total Fertility Rate and its utility. 15 marks
Discuss the problem of autocorrelation. What are the consequences of OLS estimators in estimating the parameters in the presence of autocorrelation ?
Explain the Durbin-Watson test for testing the autocorrelation. 10+10=20
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
चार मदों का निर्माण किया जाना है ताकि वे कठिनाई पैमाने पर समान दूरी पर हों । यदि सबसे सरल मद समूह के 85% द्वारा पास किया जाता है तथा सबसे कठिन 25% द्वारा, तो समूह में अन्य दो मदों को पास करने वाले व्यक्तियों का प्रतिशत ज्ञात कीजिए ।
(मानक प्रसामान्य सारणी दी गई है) 15 marks
अशोधित जन्म दर, सामान्य प्रजनन दर और वय-विशिष्ट प्रजनन दर को परिभाषित कीजिए तथा बताइए कि प्रत्येक को प्रजनन के पूर्ववर्ती माप पर सुधार क्यों माना जाता है।
संपूर्ण प्रजनन दर को परिभाषित कीजिए तथा इसकी उपयोगिता बताइए। 15
स्वसहसंबंध की समस्या की चर्चा कीजिए। स्वसहसंबंध की उपस्थिति में प्राचलों के आकलन में ओ एल एस आकलकों के क्या परिणाम होते हैं ?
स्वसहसंबंध के परीक्षण के लिए डर्बिन-वॉटसन परीक्षण की व्याख्या कीजिए। 10+10=20
Model answer
Written by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key.
(a) In the normal-ogive difficulty model, if p is the proportion passing an item, its difficulty coordinate is z = Φ⁻¹(1−p), since p = P(Z ≥ z). Let the four difficulty coordinates be z₁, z₂, z₃, z₄ in increasing difficulty. Given easiest item: p₁ = 0.85, so z₁ = Φ⁻¹(0.15) = −1.036. Given hardest item: p₄ = 0.25, so z₄ = Φ⁻¹(0.75) = 0.674. Equispacing gives interval h = (z₄ − z₁)/3 = (0.674 − (−1.036))/3 = 1.710/3 = 0.570. Thus z₂ = −1.036 + 0.570 = −0.466, and z₃ = −1.036 + 2(0.570) = 0.104. Therefore p₂ = P(Z ≥ −0.466) = Φ(0.466) = 0.6794 = 67.94%. p₃ = P(Z ≥ 0.104) = 1 − Φ(0.104) = 1 − 0.5415 = 0.4585 = 45.85%. So the other two items are passed by 67.94% and 45.85% respectively, under normality and equal spacing on the normal difficulty scale.
(b) Crude Birth Rate (CBR) = (B/P) × 1000, where B is the number of live births in a year and P is mid-year total population. It is “crude” because the denominator includes all persons, many of whom are not exposed to childbearing; it is distorted by age-sex composition.
General Fertility Rate (GFR) = (B/W₁₅₋₄₉) × 1000, where W₁₅₋₄₉ is mid-year female population aged 15–49 years. It improves on CBR by relating births only to women of reproductive age, thus removing the effect of males, children and older persons. It is still affected by the age distribution within 15–49.
Age-Specific Fertility Rate (ASFR) = (Bₐ/Wₐ) × 1000, where Bₐ is births to women aged a and Wₐ is mid-year female population aged a. It improves on GFR by controlling for age composition; it shows the age pattern and peak of fertility. But it gives many rates rather than one summary index.
Total Fertility Rate (TFR) = 5 Σ ASFRᵢ/1000 over five-year age groups 15–19, …, 45–49; for single years, TFR = Σ ASFRₐ/1000. It is the average number of children a woman would bear in a synthetic cohort if current age-specific rates prevailed and she survived through reproductive ages. Its utility is that it gives a single, age-composition-free summary for comparing fertility over time and regions, assessing replacement level (≈2.1), and making population projections. It is a period measure, not actual completed family size, and is affected by timing/tempo changes.
(c)(i) Autocorrelation is the violation of Cov(uₜ,uₛ) = 0 for t ≠ s in a regression model yₜ = Xₜβ + uₜ. A common first-order form is uₜ = ρuₜ₋₁ + εₜ, |ρ| < 1, where εₜ is white noise. Causes include inertia, omitted variables, wrong functional form, interpolation, seasonality and lagged variables.
Under E(X′u) = 0 and exogenous/nonstochastic regressors, OLS remains unbiased and consistent. But the Gauss-Markov theorem fails, so OLS is not BLUE. The true variance is Var(b) = σ²(X′X)⁻¹X′ΩX(X′X)⁻¹, not σ²(X′X)⁻¹. Hence usual OLS standard errors, t, F and confidence intervals are invalid. With positive autocorrelation, standard errors are often understated, causing spurious significance. OLS is inefficient and forecasts/tests become unreliable. If lagged dependent variables are present with autocorrelated errors, OLS becomes biased and inconsistent. Remedies include GLS, Cochrane-Orcutt/Prais-Winsten, or HAC/Newey-West standard errors.
(c)(ii) The Durbin-Watson test tests first-order autocorrelation. Fit OLS and obtain residuals eₜ. The statistic is d = [Σₜ₌₂ⁿ (eₜ − eₜ₋₁)²] / [Σₜ₌₁ⁿ eₜ²]. For large n, d ≈ 2(1 − r), where r = Σₜ₌₂ⁿ eₜeₜ₋₁ / Σₜ₌₁ⁿ eₜ². Hence 0 ≤ d ≤ 4; d ≈ 2 means no autocorrelation, d < 2 indicates positive autocorrelation, and d > 2 indicates negative autocorrelation. Null H₀: ρ = 0. Tables give lower d_L and upper d_U for given n, number of regressors k (excluding intercept), and significance level. For H₁: ρ > 0, if d < d_L reject H₀; if d > d_U do not reject; if d_L ≤ d ≤ d_U the result is inconclusive. For negative autocorrelation, compare 4 − d with d_L and d_U: if 4 − d < d_L (i.e. d > 4 − d_L), reject H₀; if 4 − d > d_U (i.e. d < 4 − d_U), do not reject; otherwise inconclusive. The test assumes an intercept, nonstochastic regressors, no lagged dependent variable, first-order AR errors, and normally distributed errors for exact inference; it cannot detect higher-order autocorrelation. With lagged dependent variables, use Durbin h or Breusch-Godfrey.
What "Solve" is asking you to do
Choose the method, then carry it through to a final answer. Identifying what kind of problem this is and why that method applies is the first thing marked; a correct figure arrived at invisibly earns almost nothing.
Structure that answers it
Given data and what is required → method chosen, with the reason it applies → set-up (equation, circuit, free body, trial balance) → working, step by step → answer with units and any condition of validity
Where marks are lost
Doing the middle steps mentally and writing only the result. In mathematics papers, a further loss comes from giving a decimal where the exact value in surds or fractions was wanted, or from skipping the justification a part explicitly asks for.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
Framework: UPSC Statistics Paper 2. (a) calculate: given > formula > substitution > result with units > interpretation | (b) define: precise definition > the distinguishing feature > one example | (c(i)) discuss: intro > 3-4 dimensions > example > balanced close | (c(ii)) explain: definition/context > points in order > small example > short close Full marks: Precise definitions, correct calculations, clear logical flow, and accurate statistical terminology.
Key points expected
- State assumption of Normal distribution for ability
- Convert 85% and 25% pass rates to Z-scores
- Calculate Z-scores for equispaced intermediate items
- Convert intermediate Z-scores back to pass percentages
- Define Crude Birth Rate (CBR) and its limitations
- Define General Fertility Rate (GFR) and its improvement over CBR
- Define Age-specific Fertility Rate (ASFR) and its improvement over GFR
- Define Total Fertility Rate (TFR) and its utility
Evaluation rubric
Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.
- (a) Determine pass percentages for two intermediate items using Normal distribution. 15 marks
calculate— given → formula → substitution → result with units → interpretation
Must cover
- State assumption of Normal distribution for ability
- Convert 85% and 25% pass rates to Z-scores
- Calculate Z-scores for equispaced intermediate items
- Convert intermediate Z-scores back to pass percentages
Loses marks
- Failure to convert percentages to Z-scores
- Incorrect calculation of intermediate Z-scores
- Missing final percentage conversion
Earns more
- Correct use of provided Standard Normal table
- Clear step-by-step calculation of Z-values
- Logical interpretation of 'equispaced' on difficulty scale
Extra mark
- Explicit statement of mean and standard deviation assumptions
- (b) Define four fertility rates and explain their progressive improvements. 15 marks
define— precise definition → the distinguishing feature → one example
Must cover
- Define Crude Birth Rate (CBR) and its limitations
- Define General Fertility Rate (GFR) and its improvement over CBR
- Define Age-specific Fertility Rate (ASFR) and its improvement over GFR
- Define Total Fertility Rate (TFR) and its utility
Loses marks
- Confusing definitions of GFR and ASFR
- Failing to explain the 'improvement' aspect
- Omitting the definition of TFR
Earns more
- Clear explanation of why each rate is an improvement
- Mention of specific age groups for GFR and ASFR
- Explanation of TFR as a synthetic measure
Extra mark
- Mention of specific age ranges (e.g., 15-49) for GFR
- (c(i)) Explain autocorrelation and its impact on OLS estimators. 10 marks
discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close
Must cover
- Define autocorrelation in the context of regression
- Explain the violation of OLS assumptions
- State consequences for OLS parameter estimates
- Mention impact on standard errors and hypothesis testing
Loses marks
- Confusing autocorrelation with multicollinearity
- Failing to mention impact on standard errors
- Incorrectly stating OLS becomes biased
Earns more
- Distinction between positive and negative autocorrelation
- Explanation of why OLS remains unbiased but inefficient
- Mention of inflated t-statistics
Extra mark
- Brief mention of common causes (e.g., lagged dependent variable)
- (c(ii)) Describe the Durbin-Watson test for autocorrelation. 10 marks
explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close
Must cover
- State the null and alternative hypotheses
- Write the formula for the Durbin-Watson statistic (d)
- Explain the range of d (0 to 4)
- Describe the decision rule using dL and dU
Loses marks
- Incorrect formula for the DW statistic
- Failing to explain the decision rule
- Confusing the DW test with the Breusch-Godfrey test
Earns more
- Explanation of what d values near 2, 0, and 4 indicate
- Mention of the Durbin-Watson table
- Clarification of the 'inconclusive' region
Extra mark
- Mention of limitations (e.g., requires intercept, no lagged dependent variable)
Practice this exact question
Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.
Evaluate my answer →More from Statistics 2024 Paper II
- Q5 (a) Discuss the Indian Statistical System. State some important organisations and explain…
- Q6 (a) For the linear model Y = Xβ + u, obtain the expressions for Ordinary Least Squares (O…
- Q7 (a) Explain the problem of identification with a suitable example. Also discuss the condi…
- Q8 (a) Four items are to be constructed so that they are equispaced on the difficulty scale.…