Q4
(a) Let X₁, X₂, ... be a sequence of random variables from Bernoulli distribution with mean θ, 0<θ<1. Derive SPRT for testing H₀ : θ = θ₀ versus H₁ : θ = θ₁ = 1 – θ₀, 0<θ₀<1. Also obtain expressions for OC function and ASN function. (20 marks) (b) A random sample of size n is taken from the exponential distribution with mean θ>0. Given that n₁ observations out of n observations are less than 'a'. Show that minimum Chi-square estimate and maximum likelihood estimate of θ are same. (15 marks) (c) The life of 6 items of brand-A and 6 items of brand-B are given below: A : 40 62 55 35 48 88 B : 50 70 65 30 45 92 Using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, test whether the distribution of life of both the brands are same or not at 5% level of significance. [Given that D₍₆, ₆, ₀.₀₅₎ = 2/3] (15 marks)
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a) मान लीजिए X₁, X₂, ... माध्य θ, 0<θ<1 वाले बर्नौली-बंटन से लिए गए यादृच्छिक चरों का एक अनुक्रम है । H₀ : θ = θ₀ विरुद्ध H₁ : θ = θ₁ = 1 – θ₀, 0<θ₀<1, के परीक्षण के लिए SPRT व्युत्पन्न कीजिए । इस परीक्षण के OC फलन तथा ASN फलन के व्यंजकों को भी प्राप्त कीजिए । (20 अंक) (b) माध्य θ>0 वाले चरघातांकी बंटन से आमाप n का एक यादृच्छिक प्रतिदर्श लिया गया है । दिया गया है कि, n प्रेक्षणों में से n₁ प्रेक्षण 'a' से छोटे हैं । दर्शाइए कि θ का न्यूनतम काई-वर्ग आकलक तथा अधिकतम संभाविता आकलक समान है । (15 अंक) (c) ब्रांड-A की 6 वस्तुओं और ब्रांड-B की 6 वस्तुओं के जीवनकाल नीचे दिये गये हैं : A : 40 62 55 35 48 88 B : 50 70 65 30 45 92 कोलमोगोरोव-स्मिरनोव परीक्षण का उपयोग करते हुए, 5% सार्थकता स्तर पर परीक्षण कीजिए कि दोनों ब्रांड का जीवन का बंटन समान है या नहीं । [दिया गया है कि D₍₆, ₆, ₀.₀₅₎ = ²/₃] (15 अंक)
Directive word: Derive
This question asks you to derive. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
Derive the SPRT for Bernoulli in part (a) with proper likelihood ratio development, spending ~40% time on this 20-mark component; for (b) prove equivalence of MCSE and MLE through differentiation of chi-square and likelihood functions (~30%); for (c) apply K-S test with correct empirical CDF construction and comparison against critical value D₍₆,₆,₀.₀₅₎ = 2/3 (~30%). Structure: state hypotheses → show derivations/computations → conclude with statistical decisions.
Key points expected
- Part (a): Derive Wald's SPRT using likelihood ratio Λₙ = (θ₁/θ₀)^ΣXᵢ · ((1-θ₁)/(1-θ₀))^(n-ΣXᵢ) with continuation region A < Λₙ < B
- Part (a): Obtain OC function L(θ) ≈ (A^(h(θ))-1)/(A^(h(θ))-B^(h(θ))) and ASN Eθ(N) ≈ L(θ)lnA + (1-L(θ))lnB / Eθ(Z) where Z = ln[f₁(X)/f₀(X)]
- Part (b): Set up Pearson's chi-square with cells [0,a) and [a,∞), minimize Σ(Oᵢ-Eᵢ)²/Eᵢ to get MCSE, show same equation as MLE score function
- Part (c): Construct ordered empirical distribution functions F₆(x) and G₆(x) for both brands, compute D₆,₆ = sup|F₆(x)-G₆(x)|
- Part (c): Compare calculated D statistic with critical value 2/3, conclude whether to reject H₀ of identical distributions at 5% level
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setup correctness | 20% | 10 | Correctly specifies H₀, H₁, and parameter spaces for all three parts; for (a) identifies Bernoulli pmf and θ₁ = 1-θ₀ symmetry; for (b) defines exponential pdf and cell probabilities; for (c) properly states K-S null hypothesis and notes equal sample sizes | Basic hypotheses stated but some parameter constraints missing or incorrect pdf specification in one part; may confuse θ₀ and θ₁ roles in SPRT | Major errors in hypothesis specification, wrong distributions assumed, or completely omits setup for one or more sub-parts |
| Method choice | 20% | 10 | Selects Wald's sequential probability ratio test framework for (a), Pearson's minimum chi-square method for (b), and two-sample K-S test for (c); correctly identifies that likelihood equations coincide in (b) and uses exact Dₙ,ₘ critical value | Correct general methods but may use approximate formulas for OC/ASN in (a) or incorrect minimization approach in (b); K-S procedure basically correct | Wrong test selection (e.g., t-test or Wilcoxon instead of K-S), uses fixed-sample test for sequential problem, or applies MLE directly without showing equivalence in (b) |
| Computation accuracy | 20% | 10 | Accurate derivation of inequalities for SPRT continuation region; correct differentiation leading to identical estimating equations in (b); precise calculation of D = max|F₆-G₆| = 1/6 at x=55 or similar with correct supremum identification | Minor algebraic errors in likelihood ratio simplification or in solving estimating equations; D statistic computed with small arithmetic errors but correct concept | Major computational errors: wrong likelihood ratio, failed differentiation, incorrect empirical CDF values, or D statistic completely miscalculated |
| Interpretation | 20% | 10 | Explains why SPRT boundaries depend on sum of successes; interprets MCSE-MLE equivalence as consequence of exponential family properties; correctly concludes 'do not reject H₀' since D₆,₆ = 1/6 < 2/3, noting brands have similar life distributions | Basic interpretation of results but limited insight into why methods work; conclusion stated without clear connection to critical value | Misinterprets SPRT as fixed-sample test, draws wrong conclusion about H₀ in K-S test, or fails to interpret the equivalence result in (b) |
| Final answer & units | 20% | 10 | Presents complete expressions: SPRT decision boundaries in terms of ΣXᵢ, explicit OC and ASN formulas; clear statement that θ̂_MCSE = θ̂_MLE = a/[-ln(1-n₁/n)]; final K-S decision with D statistic value and correct comparison to 2/3 | Final answers present but incomplete (e.g., OC function without simplified form) or missing explicit equality proof in (b); K-S conclusion correct but D value not stated | Missing final answers, incorrect boxed results, or no decision stated for hypothesis tests; completely wrong expressions for estimates |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Statistics 2025 Paper I
- Q1 (a) Let E, F and G be three pairwise independent events such that P(E∩F) = 0·1 and P(F∩G) = 0·3. Prove that P(Eᶜ∪G) ≥ 11/12. 10 marks (b) I…
- Q2 (a) Let X be a continuous random variable having probability density function f(x) = { (2/25)(x+2), -2 ≤ x ≤ 3; 0, otherwise. Find the cumu…
- Q3 (a) Let probability of obtaining Head on a biased coin be 4/5 and X be the number of heads obtained in a sequence of 25 independent tosses…
- Q4 (a) Let X₁, X₂, ... be a sequence of random variables from Bernoulli distribution with mean θ, 0<θ<1. Derive SPRT for testing H₀ : θ = θ₀ v…
- Q5 (a) For a two variable linear regression model Yᵢ = a + bXᵢ + eᵢ, where E(eᵢ) = 0, Var(eᵢ) = σ²ₑ, Cov(eᵢ, eⱼ) = 0 for i ≠ j, (i,j) ∈ {1, 2,…
- Q6 (a)(i) If (X, Y) follows bivariate normal BN(μ₁, μ₂, σ₁², σ₂², ρ), then obtain (A) E(e^X) (B) E(e^(X+Y)) (C) Var(e^X) and (D) Correlation b…
- Q7 (a) Analyse and interpret the following data concerning output of wheat per field obtained as a result of experiment conducted to test four…
- Q8 (a)(i) What are principal components ? Show that the principal components are uncorrelated. (10 marks) (a)(ii) Obtain the principal compone…