Q1
Write on the following in about 150 words each : 10×5=50 (a) Protein sorting in Golgi apparatus (10 marks) (b) Structure and function of Lampbrush chromosome (10 marks) (c) Symptoms, causes and treatment of thalassemia (10 marks) (d) Coupling and repulsion phases of linkage (10 marks) (e) Sympatric and allopatric speciation (10 marks)
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
निम्नलिखित प्रत्येक पर लगभग 150 शब्दों में लिखिए : 10×5=50 (a) गॉल्जी उपकरण में प्रोटीन छँटाई (10 अंक) (b) लैम्पब्रश गुणसूत्र की संरचना एवं कार्य (10 अंक) (c) थैलेसीमिया के लक्षण, कारण तथा उपचार (10 अंक) (d) सहलग्नता की युग्मन एवं विकर्षण प्रावस्थाएँ (10 अंक) (e) समस्थानिक एवं विस्थानिक जाति-उद्भवन (10 अंक)
Directive word: Write short notes
This question asks you to write short notes. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
Write short notes demands concise, information-dense coverage of all five sub-parts with equal marks weighting. Allocate approximately 30 words per sub-part (150 words total), spending roughly 3 minutes per part. Structure each sub-part as: definition → key features → significance/application. For (a) emphasize cis-Golgi network and mannose-6-phosphate tagging; for (b) highlight amphibian oocyte relevance; for (c) include Indian prevalence data; for (d) use clear parental vs. recombinant gamete ratios; for (e) cite Indian examples like Western Ghats salamanders or sympatric cichlids.
Key points expected
- (a) Protein sorting: Cis-, medial-, trans-Golgi compartments; mannose-6-phosphate receptor mechanism for lysosomal enzymes; clathrin-coated vesicles; constitutive vs. regulated secretion pathways
- (b) Lampbrush chromosomes: Extended diplotene bivalents in amphibian oocytes; lateral loops of active transcription; RNA polymerase activity; morphological marker for gene expression studies
- (c) Thalassemia: α and β chain mutations; microcytic hypochromic anemia; hemoglobin electrophoresis (HbA2 elevation in β-thalassemia trait); prenatal diagnosis; high prevalence in Indian subcontinent (Gujarat, Maharashtra, Punjab)
- (d) Linkage phases: Coupling (cis) configuration AB/ab vs. repulsion (trans) Ab/aB; parental vs. recombinant gamete frequencies; test cross ratios deviating from 1:1:1:1; recombination frequency calculation
- (e) Speciation modes: Allopatric by geographic isolation (vicariance/dispersal) with Indian examples like Nicobar megapode; sympatric by polyploidy, host-race formation, or disruptive selection; reinforcement and prezygotic isolation
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concept correctness | 20% | 10 | All five sub-parts demonstrate accurate core concepts: for (a) correctly identifies anterograde transport and TGN sorting; for (b) specifies diplotene stage and transcriptional activity; for (c) distinguishes α vs. β thalassemia genetics; for (d) accurately defines cis/trans configurations; for (e) correctly applies reproductive isolation mechanisms | Most concepts correct but minor errors in 1-2 sub-parts, such as confusing medial-Golgi function or misstating recombination frequency interpretation; thalassemia types conflated | Multiple conceptual errors across sub-parts, such as describing lampbrush chromosomes in mitosis, confusing linkage phases, or treating allopatric and sympatric speciation as identical |
| Diagram / labelling | 20% | 10 | Includes at least 2-3 quick schematic diagrams: Golgi cisternae with vesicle budding directionality; lampbrush chromosome with loop and chromomere labelling; linkage phase comparison with parental chromosome arrangement; allopatric speciation with barrier illustration | One diagram present but incomplete labelling, or describes diagrams textually without clear visual structure; missing directional arrows in Golgi or chromosome orientation in linkage | No diagrams attempted where essential (especially lampbrush, Golgi polarity, and linkage phases); purely textual description of spatial relationships |
| Examples & nomenclature | 20% | 10 | Precise nomenclature throughout: M6P receptor, clathrin, chromomeres, HbA2/HbF elevation, cis/trans linkage notation, vicariance vs. dispersal allopatry; Indian context for thalassemia prevalence and endemic species examples | Generic examples without regional specificity; standard nomenclature present but missing key terms like 'chromomere' or 'reinforcement'; thalassemia mentioned without Indian prevalence data | Incorrect or missing nomenclature, invented terms, or no examples; fails to distinguish α from β thalassemia or provide any geographic context for speciation |
| Process explanation | 20% | 10 | Clear sequential logic in process-heavy sub-parts: (a) signal recognition → ER entry → vesicular transport → Golgi maturation → TGN sorting → vesicle targeting; (c) globin chain imbalance → precipitation → ineffective erythropoiesis → hemolysis; (d) gamete formation showing parental vs. recombinant outcomes | Processes described but sequence unclear or missing key steps, such as skipping COPII vesicle formation or failing to explain why recombinants are minority in linkage | Static descriptions without process flow; lists features without causal or temporal relationships; no explanation of how sorting errors cause I-cell disease or how chain imbalance causes pathology |
| Evolutionary / applied context | 20% | 10 | Strong applied and evolutionary framing: (a) clinical relevance of lysosomal storage diseases; (b) evolutionary significance of lampbrush stage in oogenesis; (c) public health burden in India, WHO thalassemia control program, stem cell therapy prospects; (d) linkage mapping in genome projects; (e) conservation implications of speciation modes for Indian biodiversity hotspots | Mentions applied context superficially, such as noting thalassemia is 'common in India' without control program details, or speciation 'important for biodiversity' without specific conservation application | No applied or evolutionary context; treats all sub-parts as purely descriptive without connecting to medicine, agriculture, conservation, or evolutionary theory significance |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Zoology 2025 Paper II
- Q1 Write on the following in about 150 words each : 10×5=50 (a) Protein sorting in Golgi apparatus (10 marks) (b) Structure and function of La…
- Q2 (a)(i) Describe composition of plasma membrane. (10 marks) (a)(ii) Differentiate between facilitated and passive diffusion across the membr…
- Q3 (a)(i) Describe the synthetic theory of evolution. (10 marks) (a)(ii) Describe common types of mimicry in insects with suitable examples. (…
- Q4 (a) Describe the steps of constructing a recombinant DNA and its cloning. (20 marks) (b) Discuss the major morphological modifications duri…
- Q5 Write on the following in about 150 words each : 10×5=50 (a) Block to polyspermy (10 marks) (b) Fate map of frog embryo (10 marks) (c) Acti…
- Q6 (a)(i) Write down the reactions that produce NADH during Krebs cycle. (10 marks) (a)(ii) Explain the role of proton gradient in oxidative A…
- Q7 (a)(i) Explain sigmoidal nature of oxygen dissociation curve for hemoglobin. (10 marks) (a)(ii) Describe differences between adult and feta…
- Q8 (a) Describe the stages of fertilization in chick with diagram. (20 marks) (b) Draw structure of cholesterol and explain its role in health…