General Studies 2022 GS Paper I 15 marks 250 words Compulsory Mention

Q16

Mention the significance of straits and isthmus in international trade. (Answer in 250 words) 15

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

अंतर्राष्ट्रीय व्यापार में जलसंधि व स्थलसंधि के महत्व का उल्लेख कीजिए। (250 शब्दों में उत्तर दें)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2022 General Studies questions

Directive word: Mention

This question asks you to mention. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'mention' requires concise enumeration of key points with brief elaboration rather than deep analysis. Structure should follow: brief introduction defining straits and isthmus → body covering significance for trade routes, energy security, strategic chokepoints, and economic impacts → conclusion highlighting contemporary relevance like India's SAGAR policy or Indo-Pacific trade dynamics.

Key points expected

Definition: Strait as narrow waterway connecting two larger water bodies; isthmus as narrow land strip connecting two larger landmasses with water on either side
Trade route significance: Shortest maritime passages (Strait of Malacca, Hormuz, Bab-el-Mandeb) reducing shipping costs and time
Energy security: Critical chokepoints for global oil and LNG transportation affecting India's energy imports
Isthmus significance: Panama and Suez canals as artificial waterways transforming isthmus regions into global trade arteries
Strategic and geopolitical dimensions: Control over straits influencing naval power projection and trade dominance
Contemporary relevance: India's strategic interests in Malacca Strait, Chabahar connectivity bypassing Pakistan, and INSTC corridor

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	3	Precisely addresses 'mention' by listing multiple significant points with brief, accurate elaboration; covers both straits and isthmus without over-analysing any single aspect; maintains concise, point-wise presentation suitable for 250 words	Partially understands 'mention' by listing points but over-elaborates on some while missing others; may disproportionately focus on either straits or isthmus; slightly exceeds scope or remains too brief	Misinterprets 'mention' as 'discuss' or 'analyse', providing lengthy narrative; or treats it as 'define' with minimal listing; fails to address both geographical features adequately
Content depth & accuracy	20%	3	Accurately identifies 5-6 distinct significance dimensions covering economic, strategic, and geopolitical aspects; correctly distinguishes between natural straits and canal-transformed isthmus regions; geographically precise with correct locations	Identifies 3-4 significance dimensions with minor geographical inaccuracies; conflates straits and isthmus functions or misses key distinctions; some relevant points but lacks comprehensive coverage	Major factual errors in geography (wrong locations, confused features); identifies only 1-2 generic points; significant confusion between straits, isthmus, and other landforms; irrelevant or incorrect information
Structure & flow	20%	3	Clear tripartite structure with crisp introduction, logically sequenced body (trade→energy→strategic→contemporary), and concise conclusion; effective use of paragraphing or bullet points for readability within 250-word constraint	Recognisable structure but uneven flow; body paragraphs lack clear thematic organisation; either too fragmented or excessively dense; minor deviation from word limit	Disorganised or missing structure; no logical progression between points; single block of text or random point arrangement; significantly over or under word limit
Examples / case-law / data	20%	3	Specific, accurate examples: Malacca Strait (40% of world trade), Hormuz (21% global oil), Panama/Suez canals, Kra Isthmus proposal; includes quantitative data on trade volumes or shipping statistics; India-specific references (SAGAR, Chabahar, INSTC)	2-3 correct examples but lacking specificity or data; generic references like 'Suez Canal' without context; limited or no India-specific examples; minor errors in example application	Incorrect or irrelevant examples; confused naming (e.g., calling Suez a strait); no data or quantification; completely misses Indian strategic interests; examples contradict the stated significance
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	3	Succinct conclusion linking geographical features to contemporary trade vulnerabilities, India's maritime strategy, or emerging alternatives (Arctic routes, Kra canal); demonstrates awareness of geopolitical competition over chokepoints	Generic conclusion restating main points without forward linkage; minimal analytical insight; abrupt ending or slightly verbose summary	Missing conclusion or irrelevant closing statement; no analytical element; introduces new unconnected information; purely descriptive ending without synthesis

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →