General Studies 2022 GS Paper I 10 marks 150 words Compulsory Explain

Q2

Why did the armies of the British East India Company – mostly comprising of Indian soldiers – win consistently against the more numerous and better equipped armies of the then Indian rulers ? Give reasons. (Answer in 150 words) 10

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

अधिकांश भारतीय सिपाहियों वाली ईस्ट इंडिया की सेना क्यों तत्कालीन भारतीय शासकों की संख्याबल में अधिक और बेहतर सुसज्जित सेना से लगातार जीतती रही ? कारण बताएं। (150 शब्दों में उत्तर दें)

Directive word: Explain

This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'explain' requires causal reasoning for the Company's military victories. Structure: brief context (1 sentence) → 3-4 interconnected reasons (military, organizational, political-economic) → concluding insight on why Indian soldiers fought for the Company.

Key points expected

  • Superior military discipline and drill-based training of sepoys vs. feudal levies of Indian rulers (e.g., Plassey, Buxar)
  • Effective use of flintlock muskets, artillery coordination, and naval support cutting supply lines
  • Regular pay, pension (bhatta), and merit-based promotion vs. irregular payment in regional armies
  • Divide-and-rule diplomacy: exploiting post-Aurangzeb fragmentation, subsidiary alliances, and pitting Indian states against each other
  • Economic resources from Bengal revenue (post-1757) funding sustained warfare
  • Psychological factors: sepoy loyalty through regimental identity, religious accommodation (preserving caste practices)

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Demand-directive understanding20%2Directly addresses 'why' with causal analysis; explicitly notes paradox of Indian soldiers defeating Indian rulers; avoids drifting into general Company historyLists factors without clear causal linkage; partially addresses the Indian soldier dimension; some generic content on Company expansionDescribes Company conquests without explaining reasons; ignores the 'Indian soldiers' aspect; confuses with post-1858 British Crown rule
Content depth & accuracy20%2Covers military, organizational, and political-economic dimensions with precise terms (flintlock, subsidiary alliance, bhatta); accurate chronology (Plassey 1757, Buxar 1764)Mixes accurate points with errors (e.g., confusing Dalhousie's doctrine with Clive's methods); superficial coverage of military technologyMajor factual errors (attributing victories to British officers alone); anachronistic references; conflates Company with Crown army
Structure & flow20%2Logical progression from military → organizational → political factors; smooth transitions; each paragraph builds the causal argument; stays within 150 wordsReadable but uneven weightage; some abrupt shifts; word count slightly off; introduction or conclusion weakDisorganized listing; no clear introduction; exceeds word limit significantly; conclusion missing or repetitive
Examples / case-law / data20%2Specific battles (Plassey, Buxar, Anglo-Mysore Wars); named treaties (Allahabad 1765, subsidiary alliances); quantified sepoy numbers if cited accuratelyVague references ('various battles'); one concrete example only; examples not tightly linked to reasonsNo specific examples; incorrect battle names; irrelevant examples from 1857 or later
Conclusion & analytical edge20%2Synthesizes that Company victory rested on modern organizational principles overcoming traditional feudal military structures; or notes irony of Indian military professionalism serving colonial endsSummary restatement without synthesis; generic conclusion on British imperialismNo conclusion; abrupt ending; or irrelevant moral judgment without analysis

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from General Studies 2022 GS Paper I