General Studies 2023 GS Paper III 10 marks 150 words Compulsory Comment

Q1

Faster economic growth requires increased share of the manufacturing sector in GDP, particularly of MSMEs. Comment on the present policies of the Government in this regard. (Answer in 150 words) 10

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

जी० डी० पी० में विनिर्माण क्षेत्र विशेषकर एम० एस० एम० ई० की बढ़ी हुई हिस्सेदारी तेज आर्थिक संवृद्धि के लिए आवश्यक है। इस संबंध में सरकार की वर्तमान नीतियों पर टिप्पणी कीजिए। (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में दीजिए)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2023 General Studies questions

Directive word: Comment

This question asks you to comment. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'comment' requires a balanced, opinion-backed assessment rather than mere description. Structure as: brief context on MSME manufacturing's GDP share (~30% currently, target 25% by 2025 under Make in India) → critical evaluation of 3-4 key policies with their impact → nuanced conclusion on gaps and way forward.

Key points expected

Recognition that MSMEs contribute ~30% to manufacturing GDP but face credit, technology, and market access constraints
Critical assessment of PMEGP, Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE), and Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS)
Evaluation of recent reforms: revised MSME definition (investment + turnover criteria), Raising and Accelerating MSME Performance (RAMP) programme
Analysis of Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme's limited MSME coverage and need for sector-specific MSME clusters
Mention of digital initiatives like Udyam Registration, MSME Samadhaan for delayed payments, and OCEN for credit access
Balanced conclusion noting progress in formalization and credit but persistent challenges of technology upgradation and global competitiveness

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	2	Demonstrates 'comment' requires evaluative judgment, not listing; presents balanced critique with 'however', 'despite', 'nevertheless' transitions; distinguishes between policy intent and outcomes	Partially evaluative with some description; mixes comment with explain; limited critical vocabulary	Treats as 'describe' or 'list'; purely informational without judgment; no engagement with 'present policies' scope
Content depth & accuracy	20%	2	Covers 3-4 specific policies with accurate nomenclature (CGTMSE, RAMP, Udyam); notes MSME manufacturing GDP share (~30%); identifies sector-specific constraints (technology, credit, delayed payments)	2-3 policies mentioned with minor inaccuracies; generic references to 'Make in India' or 'Startup India' without MSME specificity; conflates manufacturing and services MSMEs	Outdated schemes (MUDRA mischaracterized as manufacturing-focused); confused MSME definition; irrelevant policies like Aatmanirbhar Bharat without manufacturing linkage
Structure & flow	20%	2	Compact 150-word architecture: 1-line context → 2-3 policy clusters (credit, technology, formalization) → 1-line critical synthesis → forward-looking conclusion; seamless transitions	Identifiable but uneven structure; either overlong context or abrupt conclusion; some thematic grouping but weak linkages	No discernible structure; random policy listing; exceeds word limit or severely underwrites; conclusion absent or repetitive
Examples / case-law / data	20%	2	Precise data: MSME manufacturing share ~30% of GDP, 6.3 crore MSMEs; specific schemes with years (RAMP 2022-27, $808 million World Bank support); mentions Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC) or SFURTI clusters	Round-figure estimates ('about one-third'); generic scheme names without specificity; one concrete example	No data or examples; invented statistics; irrelevant examples from large manufacturing (Tata, Reliance) instead of MSME context
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	2	Synthesizes into specific insight: PLI scheme needs MSME sub-targets; or recommends cluster-based approach like Tamil Nadu's Tiruppur textile model; notes formalization-credit-access virtuous cycle	Generic 'government should do more' conclusion; restates points without synthesis; no distinctive analytical contribution	No conclusion; abrupt ending; purely aspirational without policy linkage; contradicts own body content

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →