General Studies 2024 GS Paper I 10 marks 150 words Compulsory Suggest

Q10

In dealing with socio-economic issues of development, what kind of collaboration between government, NGOs and private sector would be most productive? (Answer in 150 words) 10

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

विकास के सामाजिक-आर्थिक मुद्दों से निपटने में सरकार, गैर-सरकारी संगठनों एवं निजी क्षेत्रों के बीच किस प्रकार का सहयोग सर्वाधिक उपयोगी होगा? (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में दीजिए)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2024 General Studies questions

Directive word: Suggest

This question asks you to suggest. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'what kind of collaboration...would be most productive' requires prescriptive, solution-oriented analysis. Begin with a brief context on why tripartite collaboration is essential, then suggest specific collaborative models (PPP+NGO, CSR-NGO-government convergence, etc.) with their comparative advantages, and conclude with a forward-looking synthesis on enabling conditions.

Key points expected

Recognition of complementary strengths: government (resources, legitimacy), NGOs (grassroots reach, innovation), private sector (efficiency, capital)
Specific collaborative models: CSR-Sammelan platforms, PM-AASHA with NGO monitoring, Swachh Bharat corporate-NGO partnerships
Sector-specific applications: agriculture (FPOs + agri-startups + extension services), health (Ayushman Bharat + telemedicine NGOs + hospital networks)
Institutional mechanisms: tripartite MoUs, social impact bonds, shared dashboards for accountability
Critical enablers: transparent data sharing, risk-pooling arrangements, community ownership safeguards

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	2	Answer explicitly identifies 'most productive' collaboration types rather than merely describing all three actors; prioritizes based on context (rural/urban, sector-specific) and uses prescriptive language ('should', 'must', 'optimal')	Describes all three stakeholders and their general roles but does not clearly rank or prioritize collaboration models; treats question as explanatory rather than prescriptive	Confuses collaboration with mere coexistence; lists government, NGO and private functions separately without showing interlinkages; misses the evaluative thrust entirely
Content depth & accuracy	20%	2	Covers at least two distinct collaborative models with accurate institutional details; distinguishes between co-financing, co-implementation and co-governance arrangements; mentions specific policy instruments	Mentions PPP and CSR-NGO linkages in generic terms; some accurate points but lacks specificity on how collaboration actually functions operationally	Vague references to 'working together' or 'partnership' without operational content; factual errors about government schemes or NGO roles; conflates private sector with CSR only
Structure & flow	20%	2	Clear progression: problem of silos → collaborative logic → specific models → enabling conditions; each paragraph advances the argument; 150 words used precisely without padding	Identifiable introduction and conclusion but body lacks clear prioritization; some repetition between stakeholder descriptions; minor word management issues	Disjointed listing without logical flow; abrupt jumps between sectors; conclusion merely restates introduction; significantly over or under word limit
Examples / case-law / data	20%	2	At least two concrete Indian examples: e.g., Akshaya Patra-midday meal convergence, SELCO's energy access model with panchayats, or NABARD's Producer Organization Development Fund; examples illustrate different collaboration types	One relevant Indian example mentioned but not elaborated; or generic international references (Grameen Bank) without Indian adaptation; examples not clearly tied to 'most productive' claim	No specific examples; only hypothetical scenarios; or incorrect attribution (e.g., calling Amul an NGO-private partnership without government role)
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	2	Synthesizes into a crisp insight: e.g., 'productive collaboration requires government as convener, private sector as risk-bearer, NGOs as trust-builders'; or flags emerging models like social stock exchange; forward-looking without being speculative	Safe summary of main points; calls for 'better coordination' without specifying how; lacks distinctive analytical framing	No conclusion or abrupt ending; mere repetition of points; unrealistic prescriptions ('complete merger of sectors') or purely normative closing ('this will lead to development')

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →