General Studies 2024 GS Paper III 10 marks 150 words Compulsory Explain

Q4

Explain the role of millets for ensuring health and nutritional security in India. (Answer in 150 words) 10

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

भारत में स्वास्थ्य एवं पोषण की सुरक्षा को सुनिश्चित करने के लिए मोटे अनाजों की भूमिका को समझाइए। (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में दीजिए)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2024 General Studies questions

Directive word: Explain

This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'explain' requires establishing causal relationships between millets and nutritional/health security outcomes. Structure: brief introduction defining millets and their nutritional profile → body paragraphs covering health benefits (micronutrients, low GI, gluten-free), food security dimensions (climate resilience, dryland cultivation), and policy relevance → conclusion linking to UN International Year of Millets 2023 and India's millet mission.

Key points expected

Nutritional superiority: high protein, fiber, iron, calcium, B-vitamins compared to rice/wheat; low glycemic index benefiting diabetics
Health outcomes: addressing malnutrition (stunting, anemia), NCD prevention (diabetes, cardiovascular diseases), gluten-free alternative for celiac disease
Food security dimensions: climate resilience (drought-tolerant, low water requirement), cultivation in marginal/dryland areas (Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra)
Economic accessibility: affordable nutrition for low-income groups, potential for reducing import dependence on pulses/edible oils
Policy integration: National Millet Mission, inclusion in PDS/MDM, export potential and farmer income enhancement

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	2	Clearly distinguishes between 'health security' (disease prevention, nutritional deficiencies) and 'nutritional security' (calorie-protein-micronutrient adequacy); establishes how millets causally contribute to both dimensions	Mentions both health and nutritional security but treats them synonymously without clear causal linkage; lists benefits without showing how they translate to security outcomes	Confuses nutritional security with food security generally; or focuses only on health benefits while ignoring nutritional dimensions; or describes millets without explaining their role
Content depth & accuracy	20%	2	Covers specific nutritional components (finger millet's calcium, pearl millet's iron, foxtail millet's protein); mentions anti-nutritional factors and processing solutions; links to India's triple burden of malnutrition	Generic mention of 'nutritious' and 'healthy' without specific nutrients; basic coverage of climate resilience without connecting to production stability and access	Factually incorrect claims (e.g., higher calorie content than rice); or superficial description limited to 'ancient grains' and 'superfoods' without substantive content
Structure & flow	20%	2	Logical progression from nutritional attributes → direct health benefits → population-level nutritional security → systemic food security; smooth transitions between individual and national scales	Acceptable structure but uneven weightage (e.g., excessive space on cultivation history, cramped health benefits); or bullet points without integrative flow	Disorganized listing of random facts; no discernible structure; or disproportionate focus on one aspect (e.g., 100 words on cultivation, 20 on health benefits)
Examples / case-law / data	20%	2	Specific data: Karnataka's ragi consumption reducing stunting; ICRISAT studies on millet yields vs. water use; mention of Odisha Millet Mission or Rajasthan's bajra consumption; UN FAO 2023 designation	General reference to 'tribal communities consume millets' or 'South India uses ragi' without specificity; or mentions India as largest producer without context	No Indian examples; or irrelevant examples (e.g., quinoa from South America); or fabricated statistics without credibility
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	2	Forward-looking synthesis: millets as bridge between agricultural sustainability and public health; addresses consumption barriers (taste, processing, urban preference); suggests integration with POSHAN Abhiyaan and climate adaptation	Generic summary restating points; or simplistic conclusion like 'millets are good for India' without analytical depth	No conclusion; or abrupt ending; or contradictory conclusion undermining previous arguments; or purely descriptive closing without synthesis

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →