General Studies 2022 GS Paper IV 20 marks 250 words Compulsory Critically examine

Q12

You are appointed as an officer heading the section in Environment Pollution Control Board to ensure compliance and its follow-up. In that region, there were large number of small and medium industries which had been granted clearance. You learnt that these industries provide employment to many migrant workers. Most of the industrial units have got environmental clearance certificate in their possession. The environmental clearance seeks to curb industries and projects that supposedly hamper environment and living species in the region. But in practice, most of these units remain to be polluting units in several ways like air, water and soil pollution. As such, local people encountered persistent health problems. It was confirmed that majority of the industries were violating environmental compliance. You issued notice to all the industrial units to apply for fresh environmental clearance certificate from the competent authority. However, your action met with hostile response from a section of the industrial units, other vested interest persons and a section of the local politicians. The workers also became very hostile to you as they felt that your action would lead to the closure of these industrial units, and the resultant unemployment will lead to insecurity and uncertainty in their livelihood. Many owners of the industries approached you with the plea that you should not initiate harsh action as it would compel them to close their units, and cause huge financial loss, shortage of their products in the market. These would obviously add to the sufferings of the labourers and the consumers alike. The labour union also sent you representation requesting against the closure of the units. You simultaneously started receiving threats from unknown corners. You however received supports from some of your colleagues, who advised you to act freely to ensure environmental compliance. Local NGOs also came to your support and they demanded the closure of the polluting units immediately. (a) What are the options available to you under the given situation? (b) Critically examine the options listed by you. (c) What type of mechanism would you suggest to ensure environmental compliance? (d) What are the ethical dilemmas you faced in exercising your option? (Answer in 250 words)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

आपको पर्यावरण प्रदूषण नियंत्रण बोर्ड में अनुभाग का शीर्ष अधिकारी नियुक्त किया जाता है ताकि अनुपालन सुनिश्चित हो और इसकी अनुवर्ती का पालन हो सके। उस क्षेत्र में बड़ी संख्या में लघु और मध्यम उद्योग थे जिन्हें अनापत्ति दी जा चुकी थी। आपको पता चला कि ये उद्योग अनेक प्रवासी कामगारों को रोजगार मुहैया कराते हैं। अधिकांश औद्योगिक इकाइयों के पास पर्यावरणीय अनापत्ति प्रमाण-पत्र हैं। पर्यावरणीय अनापत्ति उन उद्योगों और परियोजनाओं पर अंकुश लगाने के लिए है जो इस क्षेत्र में पर्यावरण और जीवित प्रजातियों को कथित रूप से बाधित करती हैं। लेकिन व्यवहार में इनमें से अधिकांश इकाइयाँ वायु, जल और मृदा प्रदूषित इकाइयाँ बनी हुई हैं। ऐसे में स्थानीय लोगों को लगातार स्वास्थ्य समस्याओं का सामना करना पड़ रहा है। यह पृष्ठ की गई कि अधिकांश उद्योग पर्यावरणीय अनुपालन का उल्लंघन कर रहे थे। आपने नया पर्यावरणीय अनापत्ति प्रमाण-पत्र आवेदन करने और सक्षम अधिकारी से प्राप्त करने के लिए सभी औद्योगिक इकाइयों के लिए नोटिस जारी कर दी। हालाँकि, औद्योगिक इकाइयों के एक वर्ग, अन्य व्यक्तस्वार्थी लोगों और स्थानीय राजनेताओं के एक समूह से आपकी कार्यवाही को विरोध प्रतिक्रिया का सामना करना पड़ा। आपके प्रति कामगार भी अत्यंत शत्रुतापूर्ण व्यवहार करने लगे क्योंकि उन्होंने सोचा कि आपकी कार्यवाही इन औद्योगिक इकाइयों को तालाबंदी की ओर ले जाएगी और इसके परिणामस्वरूप बेरोजगारी के कारण उनकी आजीविका असुरक्षित और अनिश्चित हो जाएगी। कई उद्योग-मालिकों ने इस दलील के साथ आपके पास पहुँचकर प्रस्तावित किया कि आपको सख्त कार्यवाही शुरू नहीं करनी चाहिए क्योंकि यह उन्हें अपनी इकाइयाँ बंद करने के लिए मजबूर करेगी और भारी वित्तीय हानि तथा बाजार में उनके उत्पादों की कमी का कारण होगा। जाहिर है कि इससे मजदूरों और उपभोक्ताओं की परेशानी ज्यादा होगी। श्रमिक संघ ने भी आपको इकाइयों को बंद करने के खिलाफ प्रतिनिधित्व भेजा। आपको एक साथ अज्ञात कोनों से धमकियाँ मिलने लगीं। हालाँकि, आपको अपने कुछ सहकर्मियों का समर्थन मिला जिन्होंने आपको सलाह दी कि आप पर्यावरणीय अनुपालन को सुनिश्चित करने के लिए स्वतंत्र रूप से काम करें। स्थानीय गैर-सरकारी संगठनों ने भी आपका समर्थन किया और उन्होंने प्रदूषणकारी इकाइयों को तत्काल बंद करने की माँग पेश की। (a) प्रदत्त स्थिति में आपके पास कौन-से विकल्प उपलब्ध हैं? (b) आपके द्वारा सूचीबद्ध किए गए विकल्पों का आलोचनात्मक परीक्षण कीजिए। (c) पर्यावरणीय अनुपालन सुनिश्चित करने के लिए आप किस प्रकार की क्रियाविधि का सुझाव देंगे? (d) अपने विकल्पों का उपयोग करने में आपको किन नैतिक दुविधाओं का सामना करना पड़ा? (उत्तर 250 शब्दों में दीजिए)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2022 General Studies questions

Directive word: Critically examine

This question asks you to critically examine. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'critically examine' requires balanced evaluation of options with evidence-based judgment. Structure: Brief context (20 words) → Part (a): Enumerate 4-5 options (60 words) → Part (b): Critically examine each option's pros/cons (80 words) → Part (c): Suggest compliance mechanisms (50 words) → Part (d): Ethical dilemmas with framework application (40 words). Allocate time proportionally: ~25% each for (a) and (b), ~20% each for (c) and (d).

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Options include strict closure, phased compliance with deadlines, negotiated settlement with pollution control technology installation, public-private partnership for common effluent treatment plants, and differential treatment based on pollution severity/employment generation capacity
  • Part (b): Critical examination weighing immediate environmental justice vs. socio-economic disruption; cost-benefit analysis of each option; stakeholder impact assessment; feasibility and enforceability considerations
  • Part (c): Mechanisms such as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), real-time pollution monitoring with IoT sensors, third-party environmental audits, citizen grievance redressal portals, and 'polluter pays' principle with escrow accounts for remediation
  • Part (d): Ethical dilemmas including utilitarianism vs. deontological duty (public health vs. livelihoods), conflict between procedural legitimacy (existing clearances) and substantive justice (actual pollution), personal safety vs. public service, and short-term welfare vs. intergenerational equity
  • Integration: Application of Nolan Committee principles (selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability), environmental ethics (anthropocentric vs. ecocentric), and constitutional mandates (Article 21 right to clean environment vs. Article 41 right to work)

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Demand-directive understanding20%4Demonstrates precise grasp of 'critically examine' by evaluating options against multiple criteria (environmental, economic, social, administrative feasibility) rather than mere listing; for (a) presents genuinely distinct options, for (b) applies systematic evaluative frameworkLists options adequately but examination lacks depth or relies on generic pros/cons without stakeholder-specific analysis; conflates description with evaluationMisinterprets directive as 'describe' or 'explain'; provides only narrative of situation without structured options or critical assessment
Content depth & accuracy20%4Accurately cites relevant environmental laws (Environment Protection Act 1986, Water/ Air Acts, EIA Notification 2006/2020); demonstrates nuanced understanding of 'polluter pays' and 'precautionary principles'; addresses migrant worker vulnerability and informal economy dynamicsMentions environmental laws generically without specific provisions; options/mechanisms are plausible but lack legal grounding; worker concerns acknowledged superficiallyFactually incorrect legal references; ignores migrant worker dimension entirely; proposes mechanisms violating statutory mandates; conflates environmental clearance with pollution control board functions
Structure & flow20%4Clear four-part structure with explicit (a)-(b)-(c)-(d) demarcation; seamless logical progression from option generation → evaluation → mechanism design → ethical reflection; integrated conclusion synthesizing all partsAll parts addressed but transitions abrupt or word allocation skewed (e.g., excessive detail on options, rushed ethical analysis); some parts merged confusinglyDisorganized response missing one or more parts; no visible structure; rambling narrative without paragraph discipline; exceeds word limit significantly in one part
Examples / case-law / data20%4Cites relevant Supreme Court judgments (M.C. Mehta cases, Vellore Citizens' Welfare Forum v. Union of India, Oleum Gas Leak case); references successful CETP models (e.g., Tirupur, Jodhpur); mentions specific pollution indices or WHO/ CPCB data on health impactsGeneric reference to 'Supreme Court judgments' without specificity; mentions common effluent treatment plants without naming locations; no quantitative backing for health/economic claimsNo examples, case law, or data; or irrelevant examples from unrelated domains; fabricated judgments or statistics
Conclusion & analytical edge20%4Synthesizes into actionable decision with clear prioritization (e.g., 'graded response strategy' combining technology-upgradation deadlines for viable units, closure for chronic violators, rehabilitation fund for workers); acknowledges limitations and monitoring needs; demonstrates administrative prudenceVague conclusion advocating 'balanced approach' without specificity; no clear decision on preferred option; fails to address threat situation or worker rehabilitation concretelyNo conclusion; or purely ideological stance (absolute closure or complete inaction) without justification; ignores personal safety threats mentioned in case

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from General Studies 2022 GS Paper IV