Chat with us
General Studies 2026 GS Paper IV 20 marks 150 words Compulsory Discuss

GS Paper IV — Q6

(a) On the request of his Personal Assistant (PA), the District Magistrate (DM) stops the transfer of a schoolteacher who takes…

(a)

On the request of his Personal Assistant (PA), the District Magistrate (DM) stops the transfer of a schoolteacher who takes private tuition for his daughter diagnosed with learning disability. In this context, discuss the aspects of empathy versus compliance with rules. (Answer in 150 words) 10 marks

(b)

Some moral philosophers argue that spending some of your resources — without significantly affecting your financial stability — to help other people who badly suffer is our moral duty and not merely a matter of charity. Justify this claim by explaining the distinction between duty and charity. (Answer in 150 words) 10 marks

Q6 of the 2026 UPSC Mains General Studies GS Paper IV, as printed
The question as printed in the 2026 General Studies paper
Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2026 General Studies questions

Model answer

Written by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 150-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key.

(a) Empathy versus Compliance with Rules

The DM’s intervention highlights the ethical tension between compassionate administration for a special-needs child and rule-based impartiality. Halting a transfer solely on a Personal Assistant’s informal request risks favouritism, bureaucratic nepotism, and a breach of administrative integrity. Empathy must align with procedural fairness rather than proximity to authority. The DM should instead route such appeals through formal, documented transfer-exemption guidelines for medical dependencies, ensuring both compassionate consideration and transparent, rule-governed legitimacy.

(b) Duty versus Charity

Charity is traditionally viewed as supererogatory—praiseworthy but optional—whereas duty entails an enforceable moral obligation. Peter Singer’s utilitarian principle argues that if one can prevent severe suffering without sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance, doing so is an imperative duty, not discretionary charity. For example, contributing surplus income to famine relief is a basic moral requirement. Although libertarians object that this compromises absolute property rights, the fundamental right to survival outweighs marginal luxuries. Hence, aiding the destitute becomes a demand of basic justice.

What "Discuss" is asking you to do

Lay the issue out from more than one side — how it arose, what is claimed for it, what is held against it, and where it now stands. UPSC attaches discuss to broad topics with several live dimensions, so coverage of the dimensions earns more than the strength of your opinion.

Structure that answers it

Set the issue up → the case as it is made → the case against → the dimension both sides leave out → where the balance now lies

Where marks are lost

Listing facts with no thread between them, or arguing one side throughout and calling it a discussion.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Framework: GS4 Ethical Dilemma & Moral Philosophy. (a) discuss: intro > 3-4 dimensions > example > balanced close | (b) justify: claim > 3-4 reasons > evidence > conclusion Full marks: Clear, balanced, and actionable; names the 'wall' and resolves it; includes a value-wise example.

Key points expected

  • Identify the conflict: personal empathy vs. administrative duty
  • Analyze the 'easy-but-wrong' option of ignoring the rule
  • Discuss the impact on institutional trust and fairness
  • Propose a course of action balancing both aspects
  • Define the distinction between duty and charity
  • Explain the 'moral duty' argument (e.g., utilitarianism)
  • Justify the claim with 3-4 reasons
  • Conclude with a balanced judgment

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Balanced analysis of empathy vs. rule compliance in the DM's decision. 10 marks · 150 words

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Identify the conflict: personal empathy vs. administrative duty
    • Analyze the 'easy-but-wrong' option of ignoring the rule
    • Discuss the impact on institutional trust and fairness
    • Propose a course of action balancing both aspects

    Loses marks

    • Preaching instead of reasoning
    • Ignoring the 'compliance with rules' aspect
    • Failing to address the 'silent stakeholders' (other students)

    Earns more

    • Mention the 'higher right' of rule of law
    • Reference the specific rule regarding private tuition
    • Suggest a long-term solution for the teacher's daughter
    • Highlight the role of the PA in the decision

    Extra mark

    • Cite a specific Supreme Court judgment on private tuition
    • Reference the 'Right to Education' Act provisions
  2. (b) Justify the claim that helping the suffering is a duty, not charity. 10 marks · 150 words

    justify— claim → 3-4 reasons → evidence → conclusion

    Must cover

    • Define the distinction between duty and charity
    • Explain the 'moral duty' argument (e.g., utilitarianism)
    • Justify the claim with 3-4 reasons
    • Conclude with a balanced judgment

    Loses marks

    • Confusing duty with charity
    • Failing to justify the claim
    • Preaching instead of reasoning

    Earns more

    • Reference Peter Singer's 'drowning child' argument
    • Mention the 'marginal utility' concept
    • Discuss the 'social contract' perspective
    • Highlight the 'moral obligation' of the privileged

    Extra mark

    • Cite a specific philosopher's work (e.g., Kant, Mill)
    • Reference a specific ethical framework (e.g., Rawls' 'Veil of Ignorance')

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from General Studies 2026 GS Paper IV