Q7 20M 250w Compulsory discuss Hysterectomy performed without patient's own consent — medical ethics case study
Lata, a mother of two children, was admitted to a hospital for acute abdominal pain. Her sister-in-law, Sujatha, accompanied her. Dr. Mansi examined Lata and recommended a diagnostic laparoscopy. Lata's consent was taken to conduct the medical procedure under general anesthesia.
During the laparoscopy, Dr. Mansi's team discovered a tumor in Lata's uterus. A closer examination suggested that the tumor could be malignant. One option before Dr. Mansi was to extract a sample for biopsy. In that case, if the tumor was malignant, Lata would have to undergo another surgery for removal of the uterus. An alternative was to remove the uterus immediately. Dr. Mansi had to take a quick decision.
As Lata was under general anesthesia, Dr. Mansi explained the situation to Sujatha. Sujatha agreed with Dr. Mansi's recommendation for a hysterectomy, wherein Lata's uterus would be removed to avoid the risk and pain of undergoing another surgery. Dr. Mansi removed Lata's uterus after receiving Sujatha's consent in writing. Lata was informed of this the next day. She was very upset and felt betrayed as she had not consented to the removal of her uterus.
Lata complained to the police who tried to convince her that Dr. Mansi had acted with good intention to help a patient. Sujatha was of the same opinion, however Lata was not convinced and decided to approach the court.
(a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in this case.
(b) Discuss the moral conduct of the doctor in this situation. (Answer in 250 words) 20
Answer approach & key points
Framework: GS4 Ethical Dilemma Analysis (Crux, Stakeholders, Duties, Options, Course of Action). (a) discuss: intro > 3-4 dimensions > example > balanced close | (b) discuss: intro > 3-4 dimensions > example > balanced close Full marks: Identifies the autonomy-beneficence conflict, critiques the surrogate consent, and provides a structured course of action.
- Conflict between patient autonomy and beneficence
- Validity of surrogate consent (Sujatha) vs. patient's right
- Duty of disclosure and informed consent
- Ethical dilemma of 'quick decision' under uncertainty
- Assessment of Dr. Mansi's intent vs. outcome
- Critique of the decision to remove uterus without biopsy
- Course of action: immediate (apology), short-term (compensation), long-term (protocol)
- Balanced judgment on 'good intention' vs. 'violation of rights'
Q8 20M 250w Compulsory discuss AI-enabled predictive policing bias — case study
Ravi is a senior police officer with vast experience in riot control and cyber-policing. Since one year, he has been the Superintendent of Police (SP) of a district with a history of frequent rioting.
Last year, Ravi had sought installation of an AI enabled software for predictive policing. This system has been operational for approximately six months. This new system employs advanced algorithms for capturing the biometric data of persons in a crowd and swiftly relating it to a data library. This has enabled the police to identify the persons involved in various crimes.
The system has identified an immigrant and low-income neighbourhood as a centre for gang violence and drug trafficking. Aided by this AI analysis, the local police has focused its patrolling, preventive detentions and establishing checkposts. Consequently, public order and law enforcement has visibly improved.
Last week, some community leaders, civil rights lawyers and human rights activists visited Ravi's office. They submitted a memorandum that the new system is faulty as it is based on incorrect historical data caused by social biases and discriminatory policing. The memorandum also alleges that the increased surveillance has created a climate of tension amongst residents. This feeling is aggravated by the fact that the residents are not aware of the data noted against their names.
(a) What are the ethical issues including biases involved in the use of AI in data-driven policing?
(b) Place yourself in Ravi's role and discuss the alternatives available. Justify the action that optimises compliance with ethics. (Answer in 250 words) 20
Answer approach & key points
Framework: GS4 Ethical Dilemma & Case Study Framework. (a) highlight: name the salient points > one line of substance each > close | (b) justify: claim > 3-4 reasons > evidence > conclusion Full marks: Identifies specific algorithmic biases and proposes a balanced, actionable solution with clear justification.
- Algorithmic bias from discriminatory historical data
- Privacy violation via biometric surveillance
- Profilng of marginalized/immigrant communities
- Lack of transparency and informed consent
- Immediate audit of the AI system's data
- Engagement with community leaders for transparency
- Balancing public safety with civil liberties
- Justification of the chosen ethical path
Q9 20M 250w Compulsory discuss Land-use-change approval corruption ring — case study
Seema is a senior bureaucrat with a reputation of honesty and professional efficiency. She has recently been posted as the District Collector (DC) to Surinder Nagar, where a large industrial area is being established.
The new industrial area had caused many farmers to submit applications for change of land use (CLU) to convert their farmland into residential areas. There is such a glut of these applications that disposal of most of them is delayed. Seema noticed that some of these applications had been approved while disregarding the chronological order. In this case's file, Seema found a few complaints alleging that hefty bribes had been taken from some applicants in exchange for approval.
On further fact-finding, Seema realized that a small group of touts was controlling this illegal activity through some subordinate officials in the Collectorate. This had created a fear in the other employees who were reluctant to process any application. The resultant backlog has been piling up thereby hindering local economic progress and causing public dissatisfaction.
Seema was faced with a major moral and administrative challenge of dismantling this corruption network without hampering daily administrative operations. An aggressive internal investigation would result in institutional resistance and, possibly, a backlash from labour unions. Conversely, ignoring this situation would encourage the wrongdoers and unnecessarily continue this avoidable harassment to the populace.
(a) What are the ethical issues involved in this case?
(b) Discuss the options open to Seema. Identify the recommended option and justify it. (Answer in 250 words) 20
Answer approach & key points
Framework: GS4 Case Study Framework (Crux, Stakeholders, Dilemmas, Options, Course of Action). (a) highlight: name the salient points > one line of substance each > close | (b) discuss: intro > 3-4 dimensions > example > balanced close Full marks: Identifies nuanced ethical conflicts and proposes a balanced, multi-step administrative solution that addresses both corruption and public service continuity.
- Conflict between duty to public and fear of institutional resistance
- Corruption (bribes) vs. administrative efficiency
- Silence vs. duty to report wrongdoing
- Impact on public trust and economic progress
- Identify at least 3 distinct options (e.g., aggressive investigation, gradual reform, ignoring)
- Justify the recommended option with specific reasoning
- Address the 'backlash from labour unions' constraint
- Propose a course of action (immediate/short-term/long-term)
Q10 20M 250w Compulsory discuss PDS biometric exclusion of EWS beneficiaries — case study
Vikas is a government officer with over a decade of service in public administration. He has recently moved as the District Collector (DC) of Nainipura, a remote hilly district bordering a forest. Due to Nainipura's low levels of economic development, one of his major duties is to ensure proper functioning of the public distribution system (PDS) amongst the economically weaker sections (EWS).
During his on-site visits, Vikas was apprised of a typical administrative challenge in operating the PDS. To prevent leakages, all distributors were required to carry out real-time biometric identification of the beneficiaries, whose fingerprints were tallied with identity card records. This was creating problems as the operating system sometimes rejected fingerprint matching in the cases of growing children, manual labourers and senior citizens. The problem was further compounded in periods of low WiFi connectivity. The distributors, in such cases, resorted to personal discretion when they could identify the recipient.
Vikas had to address this problem on priority. Strictly adhering to government regulations would ensure fiscal probity but would greatly trouble the proposed beneficiary, i.e., EWS. It may even impinge on their fundamental right to life as per Article 21 of the Constitution. Conversely, leaving the resolution solely to the discretion of the distributors could lead to misuse and leakages.
(a) What are the options open to Vikas? How should he balance fiscal probity with empathy towards the designated beneficiaries?
(b) Discuss the ethics of using technology as a gatekeeper for welfare schemes. (Answer in 250 words) 20
Answer approach & key points
Framework: GS4 Ethical Dilemma & Governance. (a) suggest: the problem in one line > implementable measures > who acts > conclusion | (b) discuss: intro > 3-4 dimensions > example > balanced close Full marks: Balances probity with empathy; nuanced ethical analysis of tech gatekeeping.
- Immediate: Offline biometric mode or manual override with audit
- Short-term: Grievance redressal for failed biometric matches
- Long-term: Multi-modal authentication (face/iris) for EWS
- Balancing: Strict rules for audit vs. empathy for access
- Efficiency vs. Exclusion (digital divide) trade-off
- Privacy concerns of biometric data collection
- Algorithmic bias against manual labourers/elderly
- Accountability of tech failures vs. human error
Q11 20M 250w Compulsory discuss Inter-community ethnic conflict management — case study
Rajapuram is a border district. Jhara and Biru, its two major communities, are in continual conflict with each other. The social fabric is fractured and demands mending.
Ethnic tensions between the two communities have erupted into violence resulting in a large number of deaths. The stated causes are conflicting land claims, uneven resource allocation and inadequate political representation in government bodies. Separate relief camps had to be created for the two communities. The situation is volatile and appears to be getting out of control.
Rajan has been appointed the District Magistrate (DM) of Rajapuram and tasked to quickly get the situation under control. His immediate tasks include restoring administrative authority, reopening the highway and initiating peace talks. On taking over his appointment, Rajan realized that the inter-community rivalry had even seeped into the local administration and police. With functional neutrality being the immediate casualty, it had made both communities distrustful of the government. The neighbouring country could utilize the opportunity to spur insurgent activity and further aggravate the situation. Rajan favoured a controlled approach starting with opening the highway to restore food and medical supplies. He toyed with the idea of requisitioning CRPF units to help restore administrative control.
(a) Discuss the ethical issues that need to be addressed in this case.
(b) What are the options open to Rajan? Which option would ensure protection of his non-partisan image without compromising ethics? (Answer in 250 words) 20
Answer approach & key points
Framework: GS4 Ethical Dilemma & Decision Making. (a) discuss: intro > 3-4 dimensions > example > balanced close | (b) suggest: the problem in one line > implementable measures > who acts > conclusion Full marks: Identifies all key ethical issues and proposes a nuanced, multi-step solution that balances security with neutrality.
- Conflict between duty to maintain law and order vs. neutrality
- Ethical dilemma of resource allocation and political representation
- Distrust of government due to compromised administrative neutrality
- National security risk from neighboring country's potential interference
- List at least 3 distinct options (e.g., CRPF, peace talks, administrative reform)
- Select the option that best ensures 'non-partisan image'
- Justify the choice without compromising ethics
- Address the 'controlled approach' mentioned in the case
Q12 20M 250w Compulsory discuss International arms-sale allocation dilemma — case study
Ajit has been recently promoted as the Head of the Department of Weapon Sales (DWS) in the Ministry of Defence Production (MDP). His charter of duties includes international sales of weapons produced domestically by MDP.
In two recent wars, MDP weapons have performed admirably, resulting in many countries showing interest in buying them, particularly long-range artillery and missiles. Country A and country B have asked for these weapons. However, production constraints restrict DWS to accept only one purchase order.
Country A is a developing nation with a sound technology base. MDP is planning R&D collaboration with it for the next generation of weapons. It is not part of any security alliance and needs weapons for protection from a troublesome neighbour. It seeks a large acquisition on a long-term loan.
Country B is also a developing nation. Military strength is its priority, with the military budget often ingressing into allocations for human resources and infrastructure development. It is in security alliance with a superpower who has a large military base there and periodically allots it financial grants. It is a member of an economic bloc with which the government is currently negotiating a free trade agreement. It is not a signatory of NPT but possesses smaller nuclear weapons and delivery systems. It supports some guerrilla forces abroad. It has sought a smaller acquisition and is prepared to make some advance payment. It is currently negotiating arms purchases from another nation too.
Ajit discussed this case with his counterparts in the related departments. Therein, the significant economic benefits, employment generation and stronger diplomatic relations arising from this sale were highlighted. It was also emphasized that refusing the deal could result in country B purchasing weapons from some other supplier.
Ajit was aware that in arms sales, due diligence at each stage was pivotal to ensure conformity to national policy and international treaties.
(a) Discuss the options available to Ajit. Which option should he select and why?
(b) How can Ajit balance nation's economic and strategic interests with ethical considerations? (Answer in 250 words) 20
Answer approach & key points
Framework: GS4 Case Study: Crux, Stakeholders, Dilemmas, Options, Course of Action (3 Horizons). (a) discuss: intro > 3-4 dimensions > example > balanced close | (b) explain: definition/context > points in order > small example > short close Full marks: Clear selection of Country A with robust strategic/ethical reasoning; Part (b) offers a structured, actionable framework for balancing interests within word limit.
- Identify Country A's strategic value (R&D, non-aligned, defensive need).
- Identify Country B's risks (NPT violation, guerrilla support, superpower alliance).
- Weigh economic benefits against ethical/international treaty obligations.
- Select Country A and justify via long-term strategic partnership.
- Define the conflict: Economic gain vs. Ethical/Strategic integrity.
- Propose a framework for 'due diligence' in arms sales.
- Suggest long-term policy for balancing trade and security.
- Ensure the answer fits within the 250-word limit.