General Studies 2021 GS Paper III 15 marks 250 words Compulsory Explain

Q14

What are the present challenges before crop diversification? How do emerging technologies provide an opportunity for crop diversification? (Answer in 250 words)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

फसल विविधता के समक्ष मौजूदा चुनौतियाँ क्या हैं ? उभरती प्रौद्योगिकियाँ फसल विविधता के लिए किस प्रकार अवसर प्रदान करती हैं ? (250 शब्दों में उत्तर दीजिए)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2021 General Studies questions

Directive word: Explain

This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'explain' requires clear exposition of causes and mechanisms. Structure as: brief introduction defining crop diversification; two balanced body paragraphs—first explaining structural, economic and policy challenges (MSP bias, water stress, market risks), second explaining technological opportunities (precision farming, GM crops, AI/ML, vertical farming); conclude with integrated vision linking technology to overcoming challenges.

Key points expected

Economic challenges: MSP regime favoring cereals, price volatility for horticulture crops, inadequate forward linkages
Structural constraints: fragmented landholdings, water scarcity in traditional crop belts, lack of cold chain infrastructure
Policy-institutional barriers: weak APMC reforms, insurance gaps, research-extension disconnect for minor crops
Precision agriculture technologies: IoT sensors, drone-based monitoring, variable rate technology for resource-efficient diversification
Biotech and digital innovations: drought-resistant varieties, AI-driven crop recommendation systems, blockchain for traceability
Emerging models: vertical/urban farming, hydroponics enabling non-traditional geographies, farmer producer organizations with tech integration

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	3	Clearly distinguishes between 'challenges' (barriers) and 'opportunities' (solutions), maintaining analytical separation while showing interconnection; addresses both parts proportionally in ~250 words	Covers both parts but conflates challenges with opportunities or gives lopsided treatment; misses the explanatory depth required by the directive	Treats only one part, or misunderstands diversification as crop rotation/intercropping only; descriptive rather than explanatory
Content depth & accuracy	20%	3	Accurately identifies 4-5 specific challenges (economic, ecological, policy) and 3-4 technology categories with mechanism explanation; references current policy context (e.g., PM-KISAN, National Mission on Sustainable Agriculture)	Generic listing without causal mechanisms; conflates technologies or misattributes their application; minor factual errors on schemes	Superficial treatment with confused concepts (e.g., equating diversification with crop rotation); significant factual errors on technologies or policies
Structure & flow	20%	3	Clear two-part architecture with smooth transitions; each paragraph has internal logic (problem-cause-impact or technology-application-benefit); effective signposting within word limit	Recognizable structure but uneven paragraph lengths or abrupt shifts; some repetition or digression; conclusion feels appended	Disorganized or bullet-point-like flow without paragraph coherence; severe imbalance (one part dominates); missing or incoherent conclusion
Examples / case-law / data	20%	3	Specific Indian examples: Punjab-Haryana water crisis pushing millet revival; Karnataka's drone-based precision farming for horticulture; Telangana's AI-driven Rythu Bharosa Kendras; NDDB's blockchain in milk; approximate data on crop area shifts	Generic references ('some states', 'recently') or international examples without Indian anchoring; no data or outdated statistics	No examples or irrelevant foreign cases; hypothetical illustrations without grounding; wrong attribution of schemes to states
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	3	Synthesizes how technology addresses specific challenges (e.g., precision ag reducing water risk); forward-looking but grounded observation on digital divide or need for complementary reforms; avoids mere summary	Restates points without synthesis; generic optimistic closing; or abrupt ending without closure	Missing conclusion; or purely rhetorical flourish ('diversification is key'); contradicts body or introduces new unconnected argument

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →