General Studies 2021 GS Paper III 15 marks 250 words Compulsory Analyse

GS Paper III — Q19

Analyse the multidimensional challenges posed by external state and non-state actors, to the internal security of India. Also…

Analyse the multidimensional challenges posed by external state and non-state actors, to the internal security of India. Also discuss measures required to be taken to combat these threats. (Answer in 250 words)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

भारत की आंतरिक सुरक्षा के लिए बाह्य राज्य और गैर-राज्य कारकों द्वारा प्रस्तुत बहुआयामी चुनौतियों का विश्लेषण कीजिए । इन संकटों का मुकाबला करने के लिए आवश्यक उपायों की भी चर्चा कीजिए । (250 शब्दों में उत्तर दीजिए)

Q19 of the 2021 UPSC Mains General Studies GS Paper III, as printed
The question as printed in the 2021 General Studies paper

Model answer

Written by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 250-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key.

India’s internal security is challenged by an evolving hybrid matrix where external state actors and non-state networks operate in active convergence, blurring traditional distinctions between external defence and domestic stability.

Multidimensional Challenges

State Actors: Pakistan wages asymmetric proxy war by sponsoring cross-border terrorism, exemplified by strikes in Uri and Pulwama. Concurrently, China’s "salami-slicing" tactics and transgressions along the Line of Actual Control in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh force strategic dual-front diversion and complicate border management.

Non-State Actors: Outfits such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) execute targeted attacks, while Northeast insurgent groups exploit cross-border sanctuaries in Myanmar and Bangladesh. External logistics and illegal arms conduits also sustain Left-Wing Extremism (LWE). Emerging dimensions include weapon and drug trafficking via rogue drones and state-sponsored cyber warfare.

The Hybrid Convergence: External adversaries leverage non-state conduits to wage multidimensional warfare. This includes the terror-narcotics nexus via the Golden Crescent, infiltration of Fake Indian Currency Notes (FICN) for economic destabilisation, and weaponised social media for radicalisation and communal polarisation.

Measures Required

Border and Technological Fortification: Deploy the Comprehensive Integrated Border Management System (CIBMS) and smart fencing along sensitive frontiers, alongside strengthening the post-26/11 multi-tier coastal security grid. Critical information infrastructure must be defended through robust cyber architectures under CERT-In and NCIIPC.

Institutional and Kinetic Readiness: Strengthen the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and institutionalise reforms within the National Security Advisory Board (NSAB). Maintain a credible deterrence posture, leveraging targeted cross-border responses such as the Uri surgical strikes and Balakot air strikes when necessary.

Diplomatic and Financial Containment: Utilise multilateral forums, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the UN 1267 Sanctions Committee to curb terror financing and diplomatically isolate state sponsors.

Socio-Developmental Hardening: Complement hard security with soft power through state deradicalisation programmes, intelligence fusion via NATGRID, and socioeconomic development under the Border Area Development Programme (BADP) and Vibrant Villages Programme.

A unified internal security doctrine blending kinetic deterrence, intelligence integration, and diplomatic leverage is vital to secure India's sovereign integrity against asymmetric threats.

What "Analyse" is asking you to do

Break the subject into its working parts and show how they act on each other. The marks are in the interconnections — which factor drives which, and what the resulting structure explains — not in the inventory of factors.

Structure that answers it

Define the whole → separate it into its parts → show which part drives which → what that interaction produces → what the structure implies

Where marks are lost

A flat list of causes with no account of which drives which. An answer of neatly separated headings, each self-contained, scores as description.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Framework: Security: classify threat, vulnerability, response. analyse: intro > causes > effects > stakeholders/linkages > way forward Full marks: Clear distinction of actors with specific, implementable countermeasures.

Key points expected

  • Distinguish state vs non-state actor challenges
  • Identify specific internal security vulnerabilities
  • Link measures to specific threat types
  • Include legal/institutional and developmental measures

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. The answer Categorize state/non-state threats and map specific countermeasures.  · 250 words

    analyse— intro → causes → effects → stakeholders/linkages → way forward

    Must cover

    • Distinguish state vs non-state actor challenges
    • Identify specific internal security vulnerabilities
    • Link measures to specific threat types
    • Include legal/institutional and developmental measures

    Loses marks

    • Generic 'improve security' without specifics
    • Ignoring non-state actors (terror/crime)
    • Dramatic or emotional security writing

    Earns more

    • Mention specific border/insurgency examples
    • Reference specific laws (e.g., UAPA, NSA)
    • Discuss intelligence sharing mechanisms
    • Mention soft power/diplomatic measures

    Extra mark

    • Cite specific committee (e.g., Kargil Review)
    • Mention specific scheme (e.g., PM-KISAN for rural security)

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from General Studies 2021 GS Paper III