General Studies 2021 GS Paper IV 20 marks 150 words Compulsory Elaborate

Q6

(a) An independent and empowered social audit mechanism is an absolute must in every sphere of public service, including judiciary, to ensure performance, accountability and ethical conduct. Elaborate. (Answer in 150 words) 10 (b) "Integrity is a value that empowers the human being." Justify with suitable illustration. (Answer in 150 words) 10

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) न्यायपालिका सहित सार्वजनिक सेवा के हर क्षेत्र में निष्पादन, जवाबदेही और नैतिक आचरण सुनिश्चित करने के लिए एक स्वतंत्र और सशक्त सामाजिक अंकेक्षण तंत्र परम आवश्यक है। सविस्तार समझाइए। (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में दीजिए) 10 (b) "सत्यनिष्ठा ऐसा मूल्य है, जो मनुष्य को सशक्त बनाता है।" उपयुक्त दृष्टांत सहित औचित्य सिद्ध कीजिए। (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में दीजिए) 10

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2021 General Studies questions

Directive word: Elaborate

This question asks you to elaborate. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'elaborate' requires detailed expansion with reasoning and evidence. For part (a), spend ~75 words explaining why social audit is essential across public services including judiciary, covering independence, empowerment, and outcomes. For part (b), spend ~75 words justifying integrity as empowering through conceptual clarity and concrete illustration. Structure: brief context-setting intro for each, analytical body with examples, and a forward-looking conclusion synthesizing both parts.

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Social audit ensures accountability, transparency, and citizen participation in public service delivery; its independence prevents capture by audited entities
  • Part (a): Judicial social audit (e.g., court monitoring committees, NJDG data, RTI in judiciary) prevents delays, corruption, and enhances access to justice
  • Part (a): Legal backing (MGNREGA Social Audit Units, 73rd CAA) and institutional autonomy (CAG, Lokpal) strengthen social audit effectiveness
  • Part (b): Integrity as internal moral compass enabling ethical decision-making despite external pressures—distinguishing it from mere rule-following
  • Part (b): Illustration showing how integrity empowers: civil servant refusing bribe (S.R. Sankaran), whistleblower (Sanjiv Chaturvedi), or professional maintaining standards
  • Synthesis: Both social audit (external accountability) and integrity (internal value) create complementary governance architecture for ethical public service

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Demand-directive understanding20%4For (a), 'elaborate' is met by expanding the thesis with causal logic (why independence + empowerment → accountability); for (b), 'justify' is met by establishing premise-evidence-conclusion chain with clear illustration, not mere descriptionAddresses both directives superficially—(a) lists social audit features without elaborating causal mechanisms; (b) describes integrity without rigorous justification or weak illustrationMisreads directives—treats (a) as 'describe' with bullet points, or (b) as 'define' without illustration; confuses 'elaborate' with 'enumerate'
Content depth & accuracy20%4(a) Covers all three spheres—executive (MGNREGA audits), legislature (PAC), judiciary (e-courts monitoring); (b) Distinguishes integrity from honesty/loyalty, links to autonomy and self-respect; accurate constitutional/statutory references(a) Limited to executive social audit, omits judiciary or gives generic treatment; (b) Conflates integrity with honesty, shallow conceptual treatment; minor factual errors(a) Fundamental misunderstanding of social audit (confuses with financial audit); (b) Circular definition or conflates integrity with success; significant factual errors
Structure & flow20%4Clear demarcation between (a) and (b) with balanced 75-word allocation; each part has mini-intro, analytical body, and micro-conclusion; seamless transition showing interconnection between external accountability and internal valuesParts identifiable but uneven word distribution; some structural elements missing (weak intro or abrupt ending); limited linkage between partsNo clear separation between parts or severely imbalanced (e.g., 120 words on (a), 30 on (b)); disorganized stream of consciousness; no discernible structure
Examples / case-law / data20%4(a) Specific: Meghalaya's community scorecards, CAG's performance audits, NJDG pendency data, Justice Shah Committee; (b) Precise illustration: T.N. Seshan's electoral reforms, Kiran Bedi's prison reforms, or institutional example (Satyendra Dubey Memorial Award)(a) Generic mention of MGNREGA without specific state/model; (b) Vague 'honest officer' without naming or context; examples partially relevant(a) No examples or irrelevant ones (confuses social audit with RTI activism); (b) No illustration or fictional/unsubstantiated example; examples contradict the argument
Conclusion & analytical edge20%4Synthesizes both parts: social audit creates enabling conditions for integrity to flourish, while integrity reduces audit costs—mutually reinforcing for ethical governance; forward-looking recommendation (Social Audit Law, ethics training)Separate conclusions for each part without synthesis; or generic closing statement ('both are important'); no analytical integrationNo conclusion or abrupt ending; conclusion contradicts body; purely descriptive closing without analytical value-addition

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from General Studies 2021 GS Paper IV