General Studies 2024 GS Paper IV 20 marks 150 words Compulsory Elucidate

Q3

Given below are three quotations of great thinkers. What do each of these quotations convey to you in the present context? (a) "Learn everything that is good from others, but bring it in, and in your own way absorb it, do not become others." — Swami Vivekananda (Answer in 150 words) (b) "Faith is of no avail in the absence of strength. Faith and strength, both are essential to accomplish any great work." — Sardar Patel (Answer in 150 words) (c) "In law, a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics, he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so." — Immanuel Kant (Answer in 150 words)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

महान विचारकों के तीन उद्धरण नीचे दिए गए हैं। वर्तमान संदर्भ में, प्रत्येक उद्धरण आपको क्या संप्रेषित करता है? (a) "दूसरों से जो भी अच्छा है, उसे सीखो, लेकिन उसे अपने अंदर लाओ, और अपने तरीके से उसे आत्मसात करो, दूसरों जैसा मत बनो।" — स्वामी विवेकानन्द (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में दीजिए) (b) "शक्ति के अभाव में विश्वास का कोई लाभ नहीं है। किसी भी महान कार्य को पूरा करने के लिए विश्वास और शक्ति दोनों ही आवश्यक हैं।" — सरदार पटेल (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में दीजिए) (c) "कानून के अनुसार, यदि मनुष्य दूसरों के अधिकारों का उल्लंघन करता है तो वह दोषी है। नीतिशास्त्र के अनुसार, यदि वह केवल ऐसा करने के बारे में सोचता है तो वह दोषी है।" — इमैनुएल कांट (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में दीजिए)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2024 General Studies questions

Directive word: Elucidate

This question asks you to elucidate. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'elucidate' demands clear explanation with illumination of underlying meaning. Structure as: brief interpretive introduction (20 words), three parallel sections of ~45 words each for quotations (a), (b), and (c) respectively—each unpacking core philosophy and contemporary relevance—followed by a synthesizing conclusion (20 words) that connects the three thinkers to ethical governance. Allocate time evenly: ~5 minutes per sub-part including recall and drafting.

Key points expected

For (a): Explains selective adaptation vs blind imitation; cites India's syncretic culture (e.g., yoga globalization, constitutional borrowings) without losing civilizational identity
For (b): Distinguishes faith as conviction/vision from strength as capacity/execution; links to Patel's own integration of princely states or modern infrastructure projects
For (c): Contrasts legal minimalism (actus reus) with ethical maximalism (mens rea); applies to preventive ethics in public service, corruption intent vs act
Demonstrates interconnection: all three converge on ethical autonomy—Vivekananda's self-cultivation, Patel's action-oriented integrity, Kant's internal moral compass
Contemporary relevance: technology adoption (a), administrative will (b), Lokpal vs conscience (c)
Avoids reducing quotations to platitudes; shows philosophical depth in 150-word constraint

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	4	Correctly interprets 'elucidate' as explanatory illumination with depth, not mere description; treats all three quotations as requiring philosophical unpacking plus present-context application, not isolated definitions	Treats directive as 'explain' superficially; addresses all three parts but with uneven depth, one part merely summarized	Misreads as 'describe' or 'list'; ignores present-context requirement; omits one sub-part or reduces all to generic restatements
Content depth & accuracy	20%	4	For (a): captures 'absorption' as transformative integration; for (b): distinguishes faith (belief) from strength (capacity) as complementary; for (c): precisely contrasts external legal standards with internal ethical standards—no conflation of Kantian ethics with law	Accurate but thin: identifies core meanings without philosophical nuance; conflates faith with religion or misses Kant's emphasis on intention	Misattributes thinkers or misquotes; confuses legal and ethical guilt in (c); treats Patel's 'faith' as religious rather than conviction; factual errors in interpretation
Structure & flow	20%	4	Parallel tripartite structure with clear visual/verbal markers (a)/(b)/(c); each segment follows interpretive thesis → contemporary application → micro-conclusion; seamless transitions suggesting thematic unity across thinkers	All three parts present but unbalanced (one disproportionately long); functional but mechanical transitions; lacks architectural elegance	No demarcation between quotations; rambling or fragmented; severe imbalance (one part 80 words, others 35); missing introduction or conclusion
Examples / case-law / data	20%	4	For (a): cites India's constitutional synthesis (Golaknath→Kesavananda) or cultural adaptation; for (b): Patel's Hyderabad/ Junagadh integration or ISRO's faith in capacity; for (c): Vishaka guidelines (preventive ethics) or RTI as institutionalizing Kantian intent-scrutiny	Generic examples (Gandhi for all three) or one strong example with two weak/missing; examples not tightly coupled to quotation's specific meaning	No concrete examples; or irrelevant examples (unrelated to quotation's philosophy); examples contradict the thinker's intent
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	4	Synthesizes three thinkers into coherent ethical framework for civil servants: Vivekananda's adaptive integrity, Patel's executional resolve, Kant's anticipatory conscience—positioning ethical governance as requiring all three; original insight within word limit	Summative conclusion restating three points without synthesis; or strong on one quotation's conclusion, weak on integration	No conclusion; or abrupt ending; conclusion introduces new unrelated idea; mere aggregation ('thus all three are important')

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →