General Studies 2025 GS Paper II 10 marks 150 words Examine

GS Paper II — Q7

e-governance projects have a built-in bias towards technology and back-end integration than user-centric designs. Examine…

e-governance projects have a built-in bias towards technology and back-end integration than user-centric designs. Examine. (Answer in 150 words) 10 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

ई-गवर्नेंस परियोजनाओं में उपयोगकर्ता-केंद्रित डिजाइनों की तुलना में प्रौद्योगिकी और बैक-एंड एकीकरण के प्रति अंतर्निहित पूर्वाग्रह है। परीक्षण कीजिए। (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में दीजिए)

Q7 of the 2025 UPSC Mains General Studies GS Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2025 General Studies paper

Read this question and its model answer in Hindi →

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 150-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

E-governance in India has historically prioritized technological architecture and back-end integration over front-end usability, driven by a technocratic administrative approach.

Drivers and Manifestations of Tech Bias Public procurement systems heavily favor hardware acquisition, software licenses, and technical metrics (such as server uptime and database interoperability) over user-experience (UX) research. The absence of institutionalized user testing and service design thinking results in complex navigation, language barriers, and digital literacy assumptions, as seen in early compliance hurdles with GSTN and initial access bottlenecks in web-only portals.

Emerging User-Centric Shifts However, modern delivery models are actively rebalancing this bias:

  • Mobile-first accessibility: The UMANG platform consolidates multi-departmental services into a single, intuitive interface.
  • Citizen feedback: MyGov incorporates crowdsourcing and continuous user feedback.
  • Assisted access: Kerala’s Akshaya centers and Common Services Centers (CSC 2.0) bridge interface complexities for rural citizens.

Way Forward To transition from mere computerization to true citizen-centricity, governments must mandate participatory service design, institutionalize independent UX audits, prioritize vernacular and mobile-first frameworks, and replace purely technical SLAs with outcome-based citizen satisfaction indices.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: GS2 Governance

What earns full marks: Deep analysis of the tech-first paradigm with specific examples and a clear critique of the user experience gap.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. The answer Examine whether and why e-governance projects favour technology and back-end integration over user-centric design, and how this is changing. 10 marks · 150 words

    examine— intro → how/why with reasoning → evidence → conclusion

    Must cover

    • Explain the built-in bias toward technology over user needs
    • Explain how procurement and back-end integration drive design choices
    • Identify the gap between IT logic and citizen experience (literacy, language, access)
    • Give specific examples (e.g., early GSTN glitches, authentication failures, web-only portals)

    Loses marks

    • Reciting features of e-governance without analysing the bias
    • Focusing only on the benefits of technology
    • Ignoring the user-centric aspect

    Earns more

    • Digital divide and accessibility (disability, language, connectivity)
    • Last-mile delivery and assisted access (CSCs, Akshaya)
    • User-centric correctives (UMANG, MyGov, DigiLocker, Bhashini)
    • Data protection and exclusion concerns (DPDP Act 2023)

    Extra mark

    • Reference to the 2nd ARC 11th Report (Promoting e-Governance)
    • Reference to K.S. Puttaswamy (2017/2018) on privacy and Aadhaar-based exclusion
What "Examine" is asking you to do

Test the proposition the question puts to you and return a finding on how far it holds. Examine stems carry a claim, or ask whether something has happened, and expect evidence weighed both ways before the extent is stated — often with remedial measures attached.

Structure that answers it

Restate the claim as the question frames it → evidence that supports it → evidence that undercuts it → the conditions under which it holds → verdict on how far it stands

Where marks are lost

Stopping at description. An examination has to reach a finding, and “examine with justification” means the extent must be stated, not implied.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from General Studies 2025 GS Paper II

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in